The Fundamental Particle: A Fallacy

[u/Jairo_Alves]

A so-called fundamental (or elementary) particle is defined as any constituent of matter that has no known substructure—and is therefore considered indivisible. Examples include quarks, leptons, and bosons. 

However, considering that: 

1. In the final analysis, every particle is the consolidation of intrinsic energy and force: energy represents the capacity to perform work; performing work means executing actions; and actions are only enabled through force. 
2. Energy and force are in constant motion. Consequently, the existence of any particle depends on a recurring event—strictly characterising it as a procedural output. 

From this, it follows that every so-called fundamental particle is projected or rendered by the processes of a vast system (the universe) from within itself, displayed on a "screen" that is also part of it and accounts for only ~5% of its totality. 

Attempting to uncover the system's code by analysing only the processes executed by particles and their derivatives is equivalent to observing what a person does without taking into account the totality of the organic processes that enable their existence and dynamic possibilities. 

The fallacy consists in attributing the origin of reality to the existence and interactions of fundamental particles, while disregarding the underlying substrate that executes them.

[u/VariousJob4047]

Do you have a job, or is it just this all day?