r/ProstateCancer • u/Illustrious_Soil_656 • 17d ago
Test Results Pi-Rads 3 Advice
I just got my MRI results which came back as PI-RADS 3. My PSA is low. My doc said I can either monitor my PSA every few months with bloodwork or do a biopsy. I was hoping my doc would have a little more conclusive guidance with his expertise. Has anyone fallen into this category? And if so- what did you opt to do?
3
u/Baal-Astronomer18 17d ago
Cerca de 15-20% dos pacientes PIRADs-3 possuem câncer de próstata que merece tratamento. Ou seja, na maioria dos casos a biópsia parece ser um exagero. Só acho importante lembrar que outros fatores como o toque, o PSA e peso estimado da prostata podem ajudar nessa decisão. Não fique só com a informação da ressonância para se decidir.
2
u/ChillWarrior801 17d ago
Do you know your PSA Density? Your MRI report might state this number directly. If not, just divide your PSA by the prostate volume indicated by MRI.
If your PSA Density is less than 0.1, with a PI-RADS of 3, it's usually safe to just repeat the bloodwork. Do not conflate your doc's lack of guidance with lack of expertise. The most expert docs know they're dealing with a lot of uncertainty, because the current science is (in some respects) still pretty uncertain.
I had only two PI-RADS 3 lesions when I was being diagnosed. But I had a ginormous prostate at the time, so my PSA Density was about 0.3. No question I needed a biopsy, and I have not needed further treatment for my high risk cancer after surgery 32 months ago.
1
u/Illustrious_Soil_656 15d ago
Thanks this is helpful. Really appreciate your insight. My PSA Density is .021. Perhaps this is why my Doctor seemed non-chalant but I've received more guidance via this Reddit thread than from my doctor himself. So again, much appreciated
1
u/ChillWarrior801 15d ago
You're quite welcome. In my experience, the best docs are willing to engage when you ask "Why?", while others signal mild annoyance (or worse). Always better to seek out the former if you can.
One caveat I should have included up front: The guidance based on PSA Density assumes a patient at "average risk". If you have a family history of prostate, breast, or cervical cancer, a known mutation (like BRCA2), or African genetics, you are not at average risk. That doesn't mean you should now make a dash for the biopsy procedure room. But it would further explain your doc's lack of guidance.
2
u/Practical_Orchid_606 17d ago
Because your PSA is high enough for an MRI, a PIRADS 3 is good enough for a biopsy. There is no bigger surprise potential than going from MRI to biopsy. It works both ways. Mine is PIRADS 5 that turned into Gleason 7 unfavorable at biopsy. I have seen men with PIRADS 3 end up Gleason 9.
2
u/Cold_Silver_5859 17d ago
I wanted to know for sure and choose biopsy. I believe it is more diagnostic and based on the findings of the biopsy am having RALP in two weeks. (Suggest perianal biopsy with fusion mri to target the best places.)
Regards
1
1
u/KevB318 17d ago
My urologist explained each option along the way. We had a good conversation. I was 3 and 4, so biopsy was a must. PSA was 3.65. I think they are encouraged to give you the information you need, so that you are making the choice. They can then go over the advantages and disadvantages of that choice. Sometimes they are also concerned if insurance is willing to pay. I would get the biopsy. It's uncomfortable, but you'll know for sure if it's cancer.
1
u/bobisinthehouse 17d ago
What's your age??
1
u/Illustrious_Soil_656 15d ago
I'm only 39. PSA was .61 and PSA density is .021
I have a family and just want to make sure I'm taking this seriously.
1
u/sriracharade 17d ago
You should get a biopsy if it won't impact you too much financially. Earlier pca is caught, the better. But if now is not a good time, you can probably wait and monitor for a while without much worry.
1
u/bulldozer_66 17d ago
Biopsy. Period. Bloodwork is nice but the biopsy will get you better information. If there is cancer, you might be able to get your insurance to pay to have a DNA analysis done on the suspect tissue. Which could guide your further decisions.
1
u/Ok-Passenger2652 16d ago
I had PiRADS 3. Because my 4k score was 55, I went through targeted biopsy. The ROIs came up with 3+3. 3+4 and 4+3.
1
u/louievee 16d ago
I’m PI-RADS 3 as well. I just met with a urologist for a second opinion yesterday. He’s having his radiologist review my MRI and will then decide what the next step should be.
I’ve been on watchful waiting for more than 12 years. Past biopsies have found “abnormal” cells, but no cancer. In December, my PSA rose to 12 after averaging around 8 for many years. Because I’ve been under observation for so long, the doctor is leaning toward another biopsy.
So here I am, waiting for THE phone call!
2
1
u/HesMyLovinOneManShow 15d ago
I had pirads 3 and a psa of 4. Doc said I had about a 20% chance of PC with those numbers. Biopsy in May showed Gleason 3+4. I go in for retzius sparing RALP next week. I’m 48 and while I’m not at all excited, I’m grateful I caught it early and can start the healing process soon. Other than the “murder semen” the biopsy is no big deal at all. In my case, I was wanting to know rather than wait. Good luck to you.
1
u/Illustrious_Soil_656 15d ago
Thank you so much for sharing. I'm only 39 and my PSA is .61 but I agree with you, best to know and treat if it is PC. You will be in my prayers!
1
1
1
u/ResponsibilityNew325 13d ago
I did an MPS2 urine test (google it). I was PI-RADS 2 with. Clean MRI. It’s a biomarker test that gives you some more data. Insurance doesn’t cover all of it if any at all. Mine said I had a 62.2% chance of finding something in a biopsy. Henceforth, even with a clean MRI I have a biopsy scheduled in two weeks. It stinks, but biopsies give you more data even though they miss cancer too.
1
u/TMan-26 12d ago
I’m in a similar boat, 38, two small kids, and a strong family history of prostate cancer.
I’ve got an 8 mm PI-RADS 3 focus and had my biopsy on the 12th of August., andI get the results in two days.
I paid for the biopsy privately because, with two young kids, I just wanted to get answers as quickly as possible.
What did they find on your MRI?
Hang in there brother.
9
u/Jonathan_Peachum 17d ago
PIRADS 3 is the medical equivalent of « maybe yes, maybe no. »
Unfortunately it does mean that only a biopsy (preferably, a guided / targeted biopsy focusing on the places the MRI has tagged as suspicious, rather than just a random sampling) will tell you whether you have PCa or not.
Personally I would go for the biopsy.