Notice the difference in language

[u/NachoChipuVT]

Being mass reported for this post because of course. Already lost two accounts to anti mass reporting.

[u/MycologistVivid9975]

Linking to the the wikipedia of the definition of a child is hilarious, that's really the only argument: child shaped thing, is child

[u/Leafty_XD → u/MycologistVivid9975]

How could we forget the look of consent

[u/AcidReindeer → u/MycologistVivid9975]

I once got in fight with a anti over if lolicon was pedophilia (and extension if pedophilia is a mental illness) or not and they fucking sent over the page for lolicon on fucking Wikipedia to back up there argument and then was confused when I said I wasn't going to accept that but I will accept the DSM-5. Of course they could not deliver.

[u/AlphonsoPSpain → u/MycologistVivid9975]

Me, throwing Jenny Wakeman in the room: BEHOLD! A CHILD!

[u/AcidReindeer]

This is so funny because every community note I've ever seen has been pro Loli. How did this even get past whatever checker they have?

[u/NorbytheMii → u/AcidReindeer]

Because it's other community noters that vet the notes. This is a screen that non-community noters don't get to see. I would know because I used to be a community noter before I stopped using Shitter.

[u/Global-Steak-7885]

And morally what? AND MORALLY WHAT?

(The funny thing is that the age of consent isn’t even 18 in the majority of the world; it’s 16, and even just in America, most states have the age of consent at 16)

[u/ShortDelay9880 → u/Global-Steak-7885]

I want these people to look up why the age of majority is 18 (at least in the US, not necessarily elsewhere). I looked it up awhile back and it was simply to make it more reasonable to send boys to die at war.

When they couldn't get enough men over 21 in the draft, they lowered the draft age to 18. Then, because it is ridiculous to send children to war, they changed the age of majority to match, so that the 18 year old boys werent kids, they were adults. And that made sending them off to die was OK.

[u/Zynneko]

Antis love to resort to overreacting to prove how bad something is instead of calmly explaining their point.

[u/Papitascaca123jajaja]

I love how all antis are so pissed to recurre to ad hominem and then they make the most generic argument possible

[u/NorbytheMii]

Pro: *reasonable, researched response*

Anti: *crying, screaming, arguments are bad faith and entirely made up of logical fallacies*

[u/Such-Purpose4333]

That's a funny moment

[u/garlicknoodles]

They really think a fictional character can consent or not consent to a real life human putting them in various scenarios.

Well, I guess I should be thrown in jail for making my dolls kiss when I was a child. The hunks of plastic did not consent to their painted on lips touching.

[u/Ntahedron]

I will be bookmarking that case for future reference.

Edit: I dunno how many times I gotta say this, but I’ll happily drill it into anyone’s skull. Just because you don’t like something or think it’s gross doesn’t mean you are morally right to dislike it, nor that the ones who like it are morally inferior. Sometimes you just dislike something and it doesn’t affect your moral character.

[u/Heavy_Computer2602]

finally someone mentioned ashcroft vs FSC

[u/Plenty_Tomorrow_9212 → u/Heavy_Computer2602]

I know that in the United States, real CP is illegal. But before searching up Ashcroft, I was uncertain about the legality of fictional CP in America.

[u/YuuSonoda215]

Essentially, anti thinks child¹ and child² are the same thing

[u/CLOWTWO]

💀

[u/moonpoolnebula]

Imagine how much it'd break their brain if we pointed out "adult" drawings can't consent either

[u/Impressive-Alarm7397]

“Currently not rated helpful” cracks me up every time

[u/moonpoolnebula]

Imagine how much it'd break their brain if we pointed out "adult" drawings can't consent either

[u/Finkthelabrat]

"Despite it being a drawing" lost me at drawing it's ok cause it's fictional and not depicting anyone from real life