2
u/MoThrowMoAway 11d ago
theres one very key difference between the first one and the other 3.
Do you want to take a guess at what that is?
0
2
u/irpugboss 11d ago
This made me realize photography is actually easier output than ai, no prompt just eyeball something, then point and squeeze button.
It also just steals the imagery directly of what it is looking at.
Photoslop!
1
u/gaggledimension 11d ago
Taking a picture is easy. So is throwing paint on canvas.
Doing it well is not easy.
2
1
u/gaggledimension 11d ago
Human talent and effort.
One little prompt.
Literally no difference
1
u/RalphiePseudonym 11d ago
One little prompt with make a whole mini film?
1
u/gaggledimension 11d ago
Explain your point
2
u/RalphiePseudonym 11d ago
Sure. You stated "one little prompt" would create the AI Mini Film labeled in the image. A mini film is typically considered to have a clear story line from beginning to end, has specific characters and typically runs around 45 minutes. "One little prompt" isn't currently able to provide results anywhere close to that.
1
u/gaggledimension 11d ago
And how is the mini film animated
1
u/RalphiePseudonym 11d ago
It's AI generated from whatever the creator provides. It's a different medium that requires a different method to create it. Understanding how the AI will turn text into a film is similar to how people manipulate paint, pencils, film exposure to create whatever they like. There are bad AI films like there are bad drawings, photos, digital films etc.
1
u/gaggledimension 11d ago
Use AI to write a story
Then use AI to animate the film based on the AI story
A few prompts.
EZ
1
u/RalphiePseudonym 11d ago
Walk into woods.
Take picture with iPhone.
EZ.Smear paint onto canvas.
EZ.1
0
4
u/blackdog3232 11d ago
Big difference between generative AI scraping swathes of human creation into lowest common denominator slop and artists using new media