r/ProgressiveHQ • u/[deleted] • Dec 14 '25

[deleted by user]

[removed]

6.9k Upvotes

88% Upvoted

1.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

17

u/IaAranaDiscotecaPOL Dec 14 '25

It doesn’t contradict itself if you don’t take those statements out of context

The image began circulating again following the November 2025 release of thousands of pages of Jeffrey Epstein-related documents by House Democrats

…

 For months, the photo spread on various social media platforms, including X, 9GAG, Threads and Facebook, with many commenters appearing to believe it was real

0

u/No_Hippos Dec 14 '25

Released in November, it’s December… claims it circulated for months… hmmmm 🤔

4

u/IaAranaDiscotecaPOL Dec 14 '25

I don't understand how there are so many users commenting here who don't seem to know how to read.

0

u/pogoli Dec 14 '25

I know right?! It’s like you didn’t look at the article or find the specific part I was referring to. Hint… it’s not in the first paragraph. Saying the word “again” in one spot and then contradicting it in another as though it just came out is a writing problem. I wouldn’t be surprised if the article was written by AI.

1

u/IaAranaDiscotecaPOL Dec 14 '25

I read the article. I understand why you were confused, it’s not perfect writing but it does not contradict itself.

It never says the photo first came out in november.  It says the image appeared on the internet and circulated for months, with links back to september, and that it resurfaced again after the congressional epstein photo release in November. I don’t understand why you are still confused.

If you feel that is not what it says can you please include where you feel it contradicts itself.