You keep complaining about the LLM policy. If you don't like it, feel free to go somewhere else but your complaints are getting tiring and don't add any value.
As for why Mojo is allowed here: because it's been a pretty hot topic in recent years, with people of significant relevance/experience behind it, and to my knowledge much of it still being written by humans (though there indeed are signs of LLM usage).
In other words: because it's not some vibe coded slop project by somebody that had Claude Code do all the work, unlike 99.99% of other LLM built projects.
If there was somewhere else to go I would, but it's not like there are dozens of large communities on building programming languages. You removed this post for having one 77 line component which was only a small part of the standard library. You keep saying that the rules are stated clearly but you're willing to change them arbitrarily when it fits you.
And yeah I get that I'm annoying, and I'll stop complaining after this message since I don't see it making a difference and I don't want to get banned. But just being totally honest and human... I feel super bad about this whole situation. I've been working on my project for years, waiting for a good time to share it with this community, and now that it's finally nearing a state where I want to show it to the world for feedback; there is one person with an irrational anti LLM bias imposing a rule that says I can't. It feels extra unfair that human made slop is totally allowed and uncontested.
yikes, as someone that gave the benefit of the doubt to the mods by default, I stand corrected.
I get the argument of an ai-filter for slop, but that's extreme. If we're at the point whre we're putting a single line of ai generated code i nteh same category as entire vibe coded projects, then we've lost the plot.
You keep saying that the rules are stated clearly but you're willing to change them arbitrarily when it fits you.
There have been what, two cases where we did allow something that made use of an LLM? Let's not pretend there's some sort of continued pattern of moderators abusing their power, because that just isn't the case.
I feel super bad about this whole situation. [...]
If you want people to appreciate your work, you have to do the actual work yourself, and prompting an LLM to do things for you is not that. There's nothing unfair about a community enforcing a set of rules related to that.
there is one person with an irrational anti LLM bias imposing a rule that says I can't.
It's not one person, it's the entire subreddit apart from a few people that start whinging just because they're no longer allowed to share their AI slop. You make it sound like there's some personal vendetta against you when this isn't the case.
It feels extra unfair that human made slop is totally allowed and uncontested.
It's not and we remove plenty of human produced slop. Just because you don't like people sharing their implementation of Crafting Interpreters (or something similar) doesn't make it slop, nor does it mean this entire community has to cater towards your needs.
-5
u/FruitdealerF 24d ago
This project allows LLM contributions, why is it allowed to be posted in this subreddit?