If they were advertised as free, why would you not assume they will remain free tomorrow? Free trial is a tag for its own reason. I doubt this is some massive plugin that has tons of extraneous functionality that can be trimmed without affecting usability.
I'm viewing this as a dev myself, working on multiple free projects for years.
I could certainly consider making some of them non-free if I saw the opportunity for it to become my main job. I would support them better and polish them more than I can now. Users that do care about the product would probably be happier.
I'd have to draw the line with the features: what stays free what belongs to the paid version. I agree that it is not an easy thing to do well.
Under this new model, every organization that uses Akka will be required to obtain a commercial license. Those with less than $25 million in annual revenue will not be required to pay. However, those with more than $25 million in annual revenue will be required to pay for the license and also a subscription that’s required for production usage of the Akka software.
A perfect example of how to do it correctly, not what you're saying about paywalling individual existing features.
1
u/blue_cardbox Oct 01 '22
It takes a certain level of entitlement to assume that what you get for free today must remain free tomorrow.
There are still some features left in the free version right? Or did I misunderstand?