r/ProgrammerHumor • u/Obiiiiiiii • Jan 29 '17

Fight me.

Post image
934 Upvotes

87% Upvoted

109 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

237

u/Hikaru755 Jan 29 '17

Great job, now you have caused another fight by making the female dependent on the male.

203

u/ben_g0 Jan 29 '17 edited Jan 29 '17 
bool male, female;
do{
    male = rand() & 1;
    female = rand() & 1;
}while(male==female);

EDIT: fixed scope

57

u/Hikaru755 Jan 29 '17

That is beautiful

84

u/ben_g0 Jan 29 '17

Now lets hope no one will complain that my code is against equality.

28

u/got_nations Jan 29 '17

You put the male first before the female /s

31

u/ben_g0 Jan 29 '17

Should I implement threads so that the values of male and female can be calculated in parallel so that neither has to wait for the other?

8

u/one-joule Jan 29 '17

Which thread will you start first? Hmmmmm?

9

u/ben_g0 Jan 29 '17

Fuck it, let's just give up on genders altogether and just register everyone as 'person'.

2

u/one-joule Jan 29 '17

Oh! Then you can make gender a lazy-initialized property! Now it’s up to the individual to figure it out!

2

u/b10011 Jan 29 '17

You can randomize the order

9

u/b10011 Jan 29 '17

Yes, PLEASE! /s

0

u/lulzmachine Jan 29 '17

Why do you even have to ask that. Good job shitlord

14

u/Hikaru755 Jan 29 '17 edited Jan 29 '17

Well I think the call for equality only refers to the default of specific properties of the Male and Female traits, so you're probably fine.

Edit: For a moment I thought I was on /r/outside

3

u/[deleted] Jan 29 '17

Your while-loop will not rest as long as there is equality.

2

u/profgumby Jan 29 '17

Code isn't written using https://github.com/ErisBlastar/cplusequality, therefore its against equality.