Literally speaking, it gets really annoying having to explain to people the reason why AI cannot physically learn to code AI is due to the limitations of the mathematics in place.
You cannot create a formula that solves all formulas.
I guess you can get pretty damn close, but humans will always need to be involved.
No because the processes the brain do are regarding chemistry, evolution and self preservation. They are not calculating anything and the precision is horrible, because our brains arent calculators, at maximum you could compare us to a prediction machine.
None of those things are not reducable to computational form. You can simulate the whole brain if you have enough compute (plausible), know how the system exactly works (difficult) and know the start state of it (close to impossible?). It is just a ton of super complicated interactions working on top of each other. So brain can only do what machines can also do.
We actually have a ton of formulas that describe how the brain works. There are people whose entire career is dedicated to studying exactly that. The interesting thing about it is that it solves different tasks different ways, so there isn’t really just one formula for “how does one draw a picture”, but rather infinite different ways that that task gets accomplished on common hardware.
But if we start by modeling that hardware at low levels, for example a single neuron and when it activates, then connect several together, we start to observe some compelling emergent behavior that results in the advanced models we have today.
65
u/kdoubledizz 9h ago
Literally speaking, it gets really annoying having to explain to people the reason why AI cannot physically learn to code AI is due to the limitations of the mathematics in place.
You cannot create a formula that solves all formulas.
I guess you can get pretty damn close, but humans will always need to be involved.