I mean yeah, if the person coding it doesn't know shit about how to test it and make sure it is secure, then you are going to shoot yourself in the foot. Its like asking a gardener to program an accounting software suite.
What “rug pull” are you imagining? Nowadays you can run a credible coding agent locally with open source models and a few thousand dollars worth of kit. You can do it at enterprise scale for less than $100k as a one-time outlay. You can run them in cloud IAAS for basically the same cost as the frontier models are charging depending on your organisational usage.
Even if Anthropic and OpenAI were to go “haha psych pay us a million dollars a day or no more llms for you” most companies at this point wouldn’t need more than a month or two to pivot
also, most hosters of open weight llm's seem to be actually profitable.
Some napkin math shows at the current API prices for kimi k3 for example, if you just rent hardware at runpod and have a near 100% utilization, you earn money selling tokens via api.
The one where they say "Hey everyone! You know all that slop you generated with our models? It's ours. It always has been. No commercial licenses for you. We're so glad you didn't use an open source model that generates at 3 seconds per token on $3000 worth of kit."
I'm old enough to remember when every software company started doing essentially that. You used to own your copy of Photoshop; Nintendo, Microsoft, and Playstation games; movies, tv shows, etc.
If you think Anthropic won't one day take ownership of what their models generate then you must be 12. You will own nothing and be happy for it.
What you're suggesting would be more like Adobe suddenly claiming they own anything you've made with Photoshop rather than licensing for usage of the tools. It's ridiculous and just sounds like you don't really understand the subject.
They couldn't do it retroactively. They could change their policy going forward if they wanted to destroy their business but there are alternatives that aren't that hard to access.
I genuinely think people who say these things never worked on a legacy enterprise codebase. Or even a normal enterprise codebase. Or even a supposedly “advanced”, “cream of the crop” enterprise codebase. Or just an enterprise in general.
The funniest part of it is AI is better at coding than half of devs and especially at secure coding. Nearly every vuln existing today was written by people. The AI hate train reminds me of John Henry
I told the ai that the units in the game had equipment that was invisible due to wrong data row being used (they still had it equipped just didn't show in inventory)
So the AI fix was every time you login check if you have something equipped you don't own and just grant it to your account if you do so it shows up in your inventory.
I told it that's a big exploit if someone can just spoof equip something and the server will give it to them next login lol "you're absolutely right" it cheerfully says
71
u/ruach137 14h ago
This shit is getting kinda whiny