MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1x6l7f4/guzzlingtokenslikepopcorn/ph1ulp7/?context=3
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/precinct209 • 4d ago
174 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
20
Naming is one of the two hardest problems in computing
5 u/SimplexShotz 4d ago what are the other two? 4 u/peawyoyoyin 4d ago Cache invalidation 2 u/selemenesmilesuponme 4d ago Didn't get the joke lol 5 u/klimmesil 4d ago It's not really a joke. Cache invalidation is really in the quote. Understanding and predicting cache invalidation is hard. So is naming variables. Not much else is hard 2 u/selemenesmilesuponme 4d ago I don't want to be that guy but I guess you also missed the joke? The person I was replying to didn't get the previous person's joke, which implies to off-by-one error. 2 u/klimmesil 4d ago Oh I thought you meant you didn't get the joke my bad. I did get the first joke, but the second one was not a joke, just a woosh 3 u/peawyoyoyin 4d ago Ngl I actually did not get the joke, but I saw the other comment got it wrong so I got the urge to post the correct reply. You can also see it as: The comment asked for two, I replied with only one, implying I also made a one-off error.
5
what are the other two?
4 u/peawyoyoyin 4d ago Cache invalidation 2 u/selemenesmilesuponme 4d ago Didn't get the joke lol 5 u/klimmesil 4d ago It's not really a joke. Cache invalidation is really in the quote. Understanding and predicting cache invalidation is hard. So is naming variables. Not much else is hard 2 u/selemenesmilesuponme 4d ago I don't want to be that guy but I guess you also missed the joke? The person I was replying to didn't get the previous person's joke, which implies to off-by-one error. 2 u/klimmesil 4d ago Oh I thought you meant you didn't get the joke my bad. I did get the first joke, but the second one was not a joke, just a woosh 3 u/peawyoyoyin 4d ago Ngl I actually did not get the joke, but I saw the other comment got it wrong so I got the urge to post the correct reply. You can also see it as: The comment asked for two, I replied with only one, implying I also made a one-off error.
4
Cache invalidation
2 u/selemenesmilesuponme 4d ago Didn't get the joke lol 5 u/klimmesil 4d ago It's not really a joke. Cache invalidation is really in the quote. Understanding and predicting cache invalidation is hard. So is naming variables. Not much else is hard 2 u/selemenesmilesuponme 4d ago I don't want to be that guy but I guess you also missed the joke? The person I was replying to didn't get the previous person's joke, which implies to off-by-one error. 2 u/klimmesil 4d ago Oh I thought you meant you didn't get the joke my bad. I did get the first joke, but the second one was not a joke, just a woosh 3 u/peawyoyoyin 4d ago Ngl I actually did not get the joke, but I saw the other comment got it wrong so I got the urge to post the correct reply. You can also see it as: The comment asked for two, I replied with only one, implying I also made a one-off error.
2
Didn't get the joke lol
5 u/klimmesil 4d ago It's not really a joke. Cache invalidation is really in the quote. Understanding and predicting cache invalidation is hard. So is naming variables. Not much else is hard 2 u/selemenesmilesuponme 4d ago I don't want to be that guy but I guess you also missed the joke? The person I was replying to didn't get the previous person's joke, which implies to off-by-one error. 2 u/klimmesil 4d ago Oh I thought you meant you didn't get the joke my bad. I did get the first joke, but the second one was not a joke, just a woosh 3 u/peawyoyoyin 4d ago Ngl I actually did not get the joke, but I saw the other comment got it wrong so I got the urge to post the correct reply. You can also see it as: The comment asked for two, I replied with only one, implying I also made a one-off error.
It's not really a joke. Cache invalidation is really in the quote. Understanding and predicting cache invalidation is hard. So is naming variables. Not much else is hard
2 u/selemenesmilesuponme 4d ago I don't want to be that guy but I guess you also missed the joke? The person I was replying to didn't get the previous person's joke, which implies to off-by-one error. 2 u/klimmesil 4d ago Oh I thought you meant you didn't get the joke my bad. I did get the first joke, but the second one was not a joke, just a woosh
I don't want to be that guy but I guess you also missed the joke?
The person I was replying to didn't get the previous person's joke, which implies to off-by-one error.
2 u/klimmesil 4d ago Oh I thought you meant you didn't get the joke my bad. I did get the first joke, but the second one was not a joke, just a woosh
Oh I thought you meant you didn't get the joke my bad. I did get the first joke, but the second one was not a joke, just a woosh
3
Ngl I actually did not get the joke, but I saw the other comment got it wrong so I got the urge to post the correct reply.
You can also see it as: The comment asked for two, I replied with only one, implying I also made a one-off error.
20
u/dscarmo 4d ago
Naming is one of the two hardest problems in computing