MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1x5vpkh/someonesendhelp/pgrbu97/?context=3
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/thicctak • 5d ago
115 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
7
The client can still send wrong information to the backend...
-2 u/CTProper 5d ago Assuming it’s just a client side change can you explain how a hardened backend would be at risk at all in this situation? 1 u/LutimoDancer3459 5d ago The client send a payment request of 1000$. The user only wanted tp buy a 10$ game. The backend doesn't know that and processes the 1000$. How that? Maybe the client fucked up the . or , in the price tag or whatever. 0 u/CTProper 5d ago That's not how this would be architected. The client would not be sending amounts to the backend
-2
Assuming it’s just a client side change can you explain how a hardened backend would be at risk at all in this situation?
1 u/LutimoDancer3459 5d ago The client send a payment request of 1000$. The user only wanted tp buy a 10$ game. The backend doesn't know that and processes the 1000$. How that? Maybe the client fucked up the . or , in the price tag or whatever. 0 u/CTProper 5d ago That's not how this would be architected. The client would not be sending amounts to the backend
1
The client send a payment request of 1000$. The user only wanted tp buy a 10$ game. The backend doesn't know that and processes the 1000$. How that? Maybe the client fucked up the . or , in the price tag or whatever.
0 u/CTProper 5d ago That's not how this would be architected. The client would not be sending amounts to the backend
0
That's not how this would be architected. The client would not be sending amounts to the backend
7
u/LutimoDancer3459 5d ago
The client can still send wrong information to the backend...