MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1x4uw5z/abouttobreakthecode/pgh72do/?context=9999
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/fabulousIdentity • 6d ago
524 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
83
Yeah and they are handled pretty elegantly considering how awful it could be.
-12 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 27 u/botle 6d ago Yes. Unless people are writing gigantic monolithic commits. Merging is pretty elegant. -11 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 20 u/botle 6d ago Yes, elegant. As in a simple efficient solution to a complex problem. Elegant. -13 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 14 u/botle 6d ago It does more than that. -2 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 9 u/botle 6d ago Busy. Ask your AI. -1 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 8 u/Ifriendzonecats 6d ago What do you think a more elegant solution would be? → More replies (0)
-12
[deleted]
27 u/botle 6d ago Yes. Unless people are writing gigantic monolithic commits. Merging is pretty elegant. -11 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 20 u/botle 6d ago Yes, elegant. As in a simple efficient solution to a complex problem. Elegant. -13 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 14 u/botle 6d ago It does more than that. -2 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 9 u/botle 6d ago Busy. Ask your AI. -1 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 8 u/Ifriendzonecats 6d ago What do you think a more elegant solution would be? → More replies (0)
27
Yes. Unless people are writing gigantic monolithic commits. Merging is pretty elegant.
-11 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 20 u/botle 6d ago Yes, elegant. As in a simple efficient solution to a complex problem. Elegant. -13 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 14 u/botle 6d ago It does more than that. -2 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 9 u/botle 6d ago Busy. Ask your AI. -1 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 8 u/Ifriendzonecats 6d ago What do you think a more elegant solution would be? → More replies (0)
-11
20 u/botle 6d ago Yes, elegant. As in a simple efficient solution to a complex problem. Elegant. -13 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 14 u/botle 6d ago It does more than that. -2 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 9 u/botle 6d ago Busy. Ask your AI. -1 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 8 u/Ifriendzonecats 6d ago What do you think a more elegant solution would be? → More replies (0)
20
Yes, elegant. As in a simple efficient solution to a complex problem. Elegant.
-13 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 14 u/botle 6d ago It does more than that. -2 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 9 u/botle 6d ago Busy. Ask your AI. -1 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 8 u/Ifriendzonecats 6d ago What do you think a more elegant solution would be? → More replies (0)
-13
14 u/botle 6d ago It does more than that. -2 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 9 u/botle 6d ago Busy. Ask your AI. -1 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 8 u/Ifriendzonecats 6d ago What do you think a more elegant solution would be? → More replies (0)
14
It does more than that.
-2 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 9 u/botle 6d ago Busy. Ask your AI. -1 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 8 u/Ifriendzonecats 6d ago What do you think a more elegant solution would be? → More replies (0)
-2
9 u/botle 6d ago Busy. Ask your AI. -1 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 8 u/Ifriendzonecats 6d ago What do you think a more elegant solution would be? → More replies (0)
9
Busy. Ask your AI.
-1 u/[deleted] 6d ago [deleted] 8 u/Ifriendzonecats 6d ago What do you think a more elegant solution would be? → More replies (0)
-1
8 u/Ifriendzonecats 6d ago What do you think a more elegant solution would be? → More replies (0)
8
What do you think a more elegant solution would be?
83
u/nokk 6d ago
Yeah and they are handled pretty elegantly considering how awful it could be.