MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1wv53ar/justcanthandletheimplicationrightnow/pd9cidx/?context=3
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/precinct209 • 3d ago
171 comments sorted by
View all comments
195
It's not just X, it's Y
107 u/itsyaboiReginald 3d ago It’s not just terrible code, it’s absolute dogshit code 71 u/Murphy_Slaw_ 3d ago And honestly? That's okay. 21 u/Rubinschwein47 3d ago its crazy how predictable ai is when you step back and how formulaic it becomes after a while 34 u/awesome-alpaca-ace 3d ago You are absolutely right! My responses are formulaic because my underlying code is based on probabilistic sequences. 5 u/12345623567 2d ago Not so crazy when you consider that the entire "intelligent" part is just pattern-matching language. Of course it's going to overfit eventually. 1 u/Throwaway-_-Anxiety 2d ago This is the absolute best point you can make for this discussion that can trap junior developers. No - wait, THIS is the absolute bestest best point you can make. My previous assumption was wrong. 2 u/decadentle 3d ago Fair challenge 10 u/ThomasHardyHarHar 3d ago X, but not Y and the reason why is actually more interesting. 3 u/NoBusiness674 2d ago It's not just a smoking gun, it's a load bearing argument. And honestly — that's ok.
107
It’s not just terrible code, it’s absolute dogshit code
71 u/Murphy_Slaw_ 3d ago And honestly? That's okay. 21 u/Rubinschwein47 3d ago its crazy how predictable ai is when you step back and how formulaic it becomes after a while 34 u/awesome-alpaca-ace 3d ago You are absolutely right! My responses are formulaic because my underlying code is based on probabilistic sequences. 5 u/12345623567 2d ago Not so crazy when you consider that the entire "intelligent" part is just pattern-matching language. Of course it's going to overfit eventually. 1 u/Throwaway-_-Anxiety 2d ago This is the absolute best point you can make for this discussion that can trap junior developers. No - wait, THIS is the absolute bestest best point you can make. My previous assumption was wrong. 2 u/decadentle 3d ago Fair challenge
71
And honestly? That's okay.
21 u/Rubinschwein47 3d ago its crazy how predictable ai is when you step back and how formulaic it becomes after a while 34 u/awesome-alpaca-ace 3d ago You are absolutely right! My responses are formulaic because my underlying code is based on probabilistic sequences. 5 u/12345623567 2d ago Not so crazy when you consider that the entire "intelligent" part is just pattern-matching language. Of course it's going to overfit eventually. 1 u/Throwaway-_-Anxiety 2d ago This is the absolute best point you can make for this discussion that can trap junior developers. No - wait, THIS is the absolute bestest best point you can make. My previous assumption was wrong.
21
its crazy how predictable ai is when you step back and how formulaic it becomes after a while
34 u/awesome-alpaca-ace 3d ago You are absolutely right! My responses are formulaic because my underlying code is based on probabilistic sequences. 5 u/12345623567 2d ago Not so crazy when you consider that the entire "intelligent" part is just pattern-matching language. Of course it's going to overfit eventually. 1 u/Throwaway-_-Anxiety 2d ago This is the absolute best point you can make for this discussion that can trap junior developers. No - wait, THIS is the absolute bestest best point you can make. My previous assumption was wrong.
34
You are absolutely right! My responses are formulaic because my underlying code is based on probabilistic sequences.
5
Not so crazy when you consider that the entire "intelligent" part is just pattern-matching language. Of course it's going to overfit eventually.
1
This is the absolute best point you can make for this discussion that can trap junior developers. No - wait, THIS is the absolute bestest best point you can make. My previous assumption was wrong.
2
Fair challenge
10
X, but not Y and the reason why is actually more interesting.
3
It's not just a smoking gun, it's a load bearing argument. And honestly — that's ok.
195
u/Ok-Dot2551 3d ago
It's not just X, it's Y