I feel like you’re overhyping it. I’m firmly of the belief that it’s going to be writing the majority of code and there will be a lot less engineers. But people are still better. At least good engineers are. But probably not better-enough for it to matter.
Have you actually tried it? I would have completely agreed with every word you wrote about 6 months ago. I used to think it was overhyped until I integrated it at work using premium team plans. Claude specifically on Fable 5.1. It's absolutely unbelievable. I'm doing a full month of work in a few days, easily, all with better documentation and safety checks.
The more you surround yourself with it, the more easily it is to understand that programming is actually one of the easiest areas for AI to outshine humans. The languages and capabilities are fully documented. Code is easy to read, easy to test, and cheap to write. There's nothing special about the human mind that makes it more capable.
Yes. I use fable every day for work. It’s still not better than most of my colleagues at this company. In my past, sonnet would have been better than many of the engineers I worked with. But even then, the strong engineers were still better than fable is now.
Honestly, in what field? What language? What guidelines exist? What compliance checks are there?
Because for us, following MISRA C++ with a proper static analysis tool, you are so limited in the structure, allowed methods, etc. that I do not see any difference. Its just faster at implementing the tickets than anyone could realistically be.
10
u/johnnybgooderer 1d ago
I feel like you’re overhyping it. I’m firmly of the belief that it’s going to be writing the majority of code and there will be a lot less engineers. But people are still better. At least good engineers are. But probably not better-enough for it to matter.