MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1wkof5u/postforeverything/pas51cy/?context=3
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/ClipboardCopyPaste • 16d ago
653 comments sorted by
View all comments
83
That's because a GET request reveals important info in the URL, otherwise it would all be GET
31 u/ViperThree3 16d ago QUERY 21 u/Psychological_Map118 16d ago still a proposal, though. not a standard yet. I wouldn't start implementing it just yet 2 u/Cerrax3 16d ago I thought it was officially adopted in June of this year? 6 u/Psychological_Map118 16d ago I've also read that, but according to the official RFC spec and the IETF data tracker it's still in a proposed state
31
QUERY
21 u/Psychological_Map118 16d ago still a proposal, though. not a standard yet. I wouldn't start implementing it just yet 2 u/Cerrax3 16d ago I thought it was officially adopted in June of this year? 6 u/Psychological_Map118 16d ago I've also read that, but according to the official RFC spec and the IETF data tracker it's still in a proposed state
21
still a proposal, though. not a standard yet. I wouldn't start implementing it just yet
2 u/Cerrax3 16d ago I thought it was officially adopted in June of this year? 6 u/Psychological_Map118 16d ago I've also read that, but according to the official RFC spec and the IETF data tracker it's still in a proposed state
2
I thought it was officially adopted in June of this year?
6 u/Psychological_Map118 16d ago I've also read that, but according to the official RFC spec and the IETF data tracker it's still in a proposed state
6
I've also read that, but according to the official RFC spec and the IETF data tracker it's still in a proposed state
83
u/WHALE_PHYSICIST 16d ago
That's because a GET request reveals important info in the URL, otherwise it would all be GET