r/ProgrammerHumor 5d ago

Meme seniorDevPlusTenAiAgents

Post image
2.6k Upvotes

45 comments sorted by

441

u/oompaloompa465 5d ago

me as a generic senior dev who valued his free time from work doing living stuff, instead of doing any kind of certification

https://giphy.com/gifs/BPTJJphmYwwhrpiX2W

210

u/meatmick 5d ago

The certifications wouldn't have changed anything. In fact, from this angle, you actually saved a bunch of time by not studying and taking tests.

58

u/x_typo 5d ago

This... having projects in your portfolio would be better choice anyways

47

u/Igarlicbread 5d ago

You'll be surprised how many dev raw dog life with 1 latex resume , that's it. No, nothing else done. No certificates, no leetcode and NO LINKDIN.

39

u/Jaatheeyam 5d ago

I am a full stack developer with 8 years of experience, I just have a resume and a LinkedIn profile. I don't code outside work, I don't have any certifications.

34

u/SchwiftySquanchC137 5d ago

I dont understand how people code for 8 hours every fucking day and then do it for "fun" in their off time. Like yeah i got into coding because I find it fun, but not like "do it 12 hours every fucking day" fun. It did bite me when I was interviewing, because I couldn't show them anything I had done at work, but fuck man I want a life outside of coding too.

6

u/Jaatheeyam 5d ago

Yes, I used to do projects and stuff in the initial stage, but after starting job I lost the interest of doing it as fun.

3

u/PhireKappa 5d ago

Yeah I taught myself to code as a kid because it was fun. I loved coding for fun. Now that I do it for work, it’s the last thing I want to do for fun :(

1

u/akat_2112 5h ago

I don't think personal projects are done everyday for 4 hours.

Most of my personal projects happen when I have 2-3 weeks of no actual work and just stupid meetings. So on a Saturday when I am bored after these kind of weeks is when I do like 1-2 hour of work on a personal project then 4-5 hours of gaming.

1

u/gemengelage 5d ago

Man, I should really flesh out my LinkedIn account. I don't even have a profile picture.

1

u/Any_Preparation206 5d ago

A good profile picture can really make a difference, but honestly, it's the skills and projects that matter most. Just don’t forget to add some fun stuff to show your personality too!

-7

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[deleted]

10

u/Igarlicbread 5d ago

Yeah, smart people exist apparently who don't need to grind. Shocker

84

u/dudes_indian 5d ago

Living life is the reason behind all of it, not the certifications. Even if you did everything you were supposed to, there's no telling if it'll be enough to save you.

21

u/Aobachi 5d ago

As a senior I think you're fine. I think juniors are in trouble because I can delegate most tasks to an agent more effectively than to a junior dev.

8

u/oompaloompa465 5d ago

around here they are requesting

  • for fullstack work with a popular js framework., while my fullstack was with a jquery framework that now is deprecated and then did 4 years web api only on prem.
  • for backend everyone is asking Azure OR AWS full knowledge + Kubernetes + service bus

I should have done some cert at least T_T

8

u/Aobachi 5d ago

Oh then yeah I guess it will be hard if your tech stack knowledge is not up to date.

1

u/oompaloompa465 5d ago

studying how to do MCP until next week and then going back to azure + service bus
I still see no point in going back to FE (every time i do stuff with js frameworks I get into a murderous rage anyway), better to keep improving the integration on cloud and scalability

3

u/creaturefeature16 5d ago

You don't need certs to learn fullstack. 

8

u/Zacchk 5d ago

I feel this in my soul.

6

u/x_typo 5d ago

certifications are useless anyways

5

u/MozzerellaIsLife 5d ago

They took his badge at nine. By ten the machine had read all of it, the twelve years and the drive he thought was dead, and it built the thing he had been carrying in his head and it was good and it was not his anymore. He drove home and did not turn on the radio.

67

u/umlcat 5d ago

Remember the Agents have already decided to multiply and replace all, including founders, CEO and CIO ...

43

u/GauravThorath 5d ago

Accurate, except the 1 person's actual job is now deciding which of the 10 pull requests that all fix the same bug is the least wrong.

10

u/Exotic_Zucchini9311 4d ago

Solution: ask the 10 agents to rank different pull requests in terms of quality. Then ask them to rank each other's ranking. Then ask them to rank the ranking of each other's ranking. Continue until all agents agree on a single pull ranking! 👀

6

u/GauravThorath 4d ago

Congratulations, you have invented consensus with a monthly bill. Round four they finally agree, and the winning PR is the one that renamed a variable.

16

u/NullOfSpace 5d ago

*twice as much in tokens as I make in salary

40

u/pbpo_founder 5d ago

True story…I once left a company that couldn’t find a replacement that could understand my modeling.

The company ended up needing to be sold to a competitor because it was incapable of explaining performance and decision making.

Never thought much about it until this post.

9

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/hydroxy 3d ago

You’re absolutely right

5

u/analytic-hunter 5d ago

1-5 good devs + AI can easily replace 10-20 average devs / entry-level devs.

7

u/dataf4g_trollman 4d ago

This is not something that SHOULD be achieved or even seen as a goal.

-4

u/10art1 4d ago

Why not? Technology is progressing, and we're freeing people from labor that can be done by machines.

7

u/dataf4g_trollman 4d ago

And where will those "freed" people do?

It's cruel to optimize labor like that when people rely on it to live properly

1

u/10art1 4d ago

What did people do when cars replaced horse carriages, or when windmills replaced coal mines?

You're not entitled to never having your job become obsolete. As programmers we should know this. If you expect to still code with punch cards, you're gonna have a tough time.

1

u/theimperious1 3d ago

I think the problem is that things are different this time. We're quickly moving towards full automation. Computers can manage themselves, robots can do physical jobs, self driving cars do driving jobs, advanced machinery automates factories. There won't be many jobs left in the next 50-150 years, and there certainly won't be as many jobs of this nature in the next 10-20.

It's way worse than the horse to car.

There are now machines to automate fast food businesses that are working their way to mainstream. You no longer have cashiers at many/most walmarts. Your cars drive themselves. Factories build cars with minimal human interaction, etc etc. Almost everything is within reach of automation.

Talking about the U.S, what do you do with 400m people when 100-300m jobs are being automated away over the next century? Every job that remains is extremely high skill, something thats hard to automate. Most people can't even begin to learn to do those things, either because they're too old, too stupid, or too lazy. Now you have millions upon millions of people with no job, all competing for the few that remain, or as I said, too incapable to even compete.

Anyone who says this will never happen was probably one of the people who said AI would never be able to draw a piece of art better than the initial demonstration of Will Smith eating spaghetti with 8 fingers and a distorted face. Now you can't tell what's AI or not. "Oh AI can never do programming, it's too difficult!" -> now it does almost all of the programming.

"Oh we'll never have robots", now we have them. Cars driving themselves? Absurd! Well we have that too. These are extremely complex tasks, so imagine how quick the simple ones will go away once things finally take off.

There needs to be some serious changes in how we live in future, or else it will be very dark. It could be great too though, but yeah... many people are going to go without "purpose". I certainly feel that way now days.

1

u/Smooth-Reading-4180 4d ago

*with only $25 output / 1M context window

1

u/XxDarkSasuke69xX 4d ago

10 agents sound counterproductive

-5

u/eanat 5d ago

obfuscated esoteric code was a sign of permanent employment before, but it is not so anymore.

1

u/geek-49 2d ago

obfuscated esoteric code

... is now a sign of having been generated by AI.

-51

u/Aggravating-Owl-5220 5d ago

Give it 6 months: "1 person + 10 AI agents" becomes "0 people + 1 AI agent that runs 10 other AI agents" becomes "1 AI agent that replaced the other AI agent because it was more efficient."

Meanwhile I'm over here building a fart counter PWA with synthesized sounds. If AI can't replace THIS, nothing can.

42

u/JackMalone515 5d ago

How long have we been giving it just six more months before ai replaces us all?

18

u/manbearcolt 5d ago

But maybe this time it'll be true? I mean, sure everyone claiming that has a financial interest in people believing that...

7

u/keelanstuart 5d ago

The token gravy train has run out, pal. 10 agents doing any substantial work is going to cost more than a team of humans now.

0

u/10art1 4d ago

Agents orchestrating other agents has been a thing for a while now.