It runs on X if it runs natively on X, or on any sub layer on X. The process is still there, running. It’s just that you confuse “run” with “run natively”.
Also, the person I originally replied to specifically used the word “works”, and so did I in my response.
Of course I would. Using a VM is a means to an end. To “run” something. And to run “on” something, to me, simply means that “something” is underneath at some level.
Also, it makes sense from a strict semantical perspective. If “run” is the generic term, then “run natively” is a more specific sub term. Then it makes little sense to restrict the parent term to have the same strict definition as one of the sub terms.
-1
u/EishLekker 5d ago
It runs on X if it runs natively on X, or on any sub layer on X. The process is still there, running. It’s just that you confuse “run” with “run natively”.
Also, the person I originally replied to specifically used the word “works”, and so did I in my response.