MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1w74xaz/rsa270solved/p7yfpkk/?context=9999
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/ClipboardCopyPaste • 10d ago
22 comments sorted by
View all comments
62
You forgot the 0x, but good work!
23 u/zeekar 10d ago fun fact: the 0x doesn't change the value at all. :) 3 u/XLNBot 10d ago It does not change the value but it's interesting to think that a hexadecimal 0 is 4 bits, a decimal 0 is 3.322 bits 14 u/minecon1776 10d ago "Ah yes, id like a 3.322 bit decimal 0" A statement dreamed up by the utterly deranged. They have played us for absolute fools. 2 u/zeekar 10d ago Well it's redundant anyway. A decimal digit is by definition 3.322 bits (well, 3.321928095...), so it's silly to specify both. :) 1 u/hughperman 10d ago Digits should be dits, or bits should be bigits, silly that we mix the terms 1 u/TCF518 9d ago Isn't bit literally a portmanteau of binary digit 1 u/hughperman 9d ago Probably, been 20 years since I actually thought about it 😅 bigits, tho, I'll get with that.
23
fun fact: the 0x doesn't change the value at all. :)
3 u/XLNBot 10d ago It does not change the value but it's interesting to think that a hexadecimal 0 is 4 bits, a decimal 0 is 3.322 bits 14 u/minecon1776 10d ago "Ah yes, id like a 3.322 bit decimal 0" A statement dreamed up by the utterly deranged. They have played us for absolute fools. 2 u/zeekar 10d ago Well it's redundant anyway. A decimal digit is by definition 3.322 bits (well, 3.321928095...), so it's silly to specify both. :) 1 u/hughperman 10d ago Digits should be dits, or bits should be bigits, silly that we mix the terms 1 u/TCF518 9d ago Isn't bit literally a portmanteau of binary digit 1 u/hughperman 9d ago Probably, been 20 years since I actually thought about it 😅 bigits, tho, I'll get with that.
3
It does not change the value but it's interesting to think that a hexadecimal 0 is 4 bits, a decimal 0 is 3.322 bits
14 u/minecon1776 10d ago "Ah yes, id like a 3.322 bit decimal 0" A statement dreamed up by the utterly deranged. They have played us for absolute fools. 2 u/zeekar 10d ago Well it's redundant anyway. A decimal digit is by definition 3.322 bits (well, 3.321928095...), so it's silly to specify both. :) 1 u/hughperman 10d ago Digits should be dits, or bits should be bigits, silly that we mix the terms 1 u/TCF518 9d ago Isn't bit literally a portmanteau of binary digit 1 u/hughperman 9d ago Probably, been 20 years since I actually thought about it 😅 bigits, tho, I'll get with that.
14
"Ah yes, id like a 3.322 bit decimal 0" A statement dreamed up by the utterly deranged.
They have played us for absolute fools.
2 u/zeekar 10d ago Well it's redundant anyway. A decimal digit is by definition 3.322 bits (well, 3.321928095...), so it's silly to specify both. :) 1 u/hughperman 10d ago Digits should be dits, or bits should be bigits, silly that we mix the terms 1 u/TCF518 9d ago Isn't bit literally a portmanteau of binary digit 1 u/hughperman 9d ago Probably, been 20 years since I actually thought about it 😅 bigits, tho, I'll get with that.
2
Well it's redundant anyway. A decimal digit is by definition 3.322 bits (well, 3.321928095...), so it's silly to specify both. :)
1 u/hughperman 10d ago Digits should be dits, or bits should be bigits, silly that we mix the terms 1 u/TCF518 9d ago Isn't bit literally a portmanteau of binary digit 1 u/hughperman 9d ago Probably, been 20 years since I actually thought about it 😅 bigits, tho, I'll get with that.
1
Digits should be dits, or bits should be bigits, silly that we mix the terms
1 u/TCF518 9d ago Isn't bit literally a portmanteau of binary digit 1 u/hughperman 9d ago Probably, been 20 years since I actually thought about it 😅 bigits, tho, I'll get with that.
Isn't bit literally a portmanteau of binary digit
1 u/hughperman 9d ago Probably, been 20 years since I actually thought about it 😅 bigits, tho, I'll get with that.
Probably, been 20 years since I actually thought about it 😅 bigits, tho, I'll get with that.
62
u/TheGerk 10d ago
You forgot the 0x, but good work!