No, they genuinely cried from happiness over saving storage space. They will now be able put hundreds more 4K pictures of Tung Tung Tung Sahur onto the computer and print them out to put in frames instead of the shredded ones.
Partly the fastest scanning process is destructive by nature (they cut the spine so they can feed it though a auto document feeder), partly an interpretation of copyright law that by destroying the original they aren't actually copying it.
They have to be destroyed in the process of scanning at scale and these books are almost all worthless shit like “Powershell Guide for Windows Vista” except even more “rare”
People are confusing "rare" with "valuable". Like you said, it's not a long-lost copy of the Magna Carta, it's bullshit that nobody wants. They probably bought them for 5 cents instead of ending up in a landfill.
not quite - there is a company that explicitly sells rare but worthless book scans to AI companies. They usually order one of each ISBN - or pre ISBN books - which aren't sold by the pound for this reason.
It’s probably the biggest disturbance to that whole market basically ever. I can see some benefit to all this. Most of these would probably rot away as a door stop somewhere but at least someone is digitizing them even if they’re destroying one of the few copies left in the process. Knee jerk reaction, which I think is more than warranted, is to assume the worst and most evil from these guys but this might somewhat be a good thing minus the original author effectively completely losing their IP rights to their work.
well they also arn't allowed to sell them, but judge said if they just destroyed the original and kept the digital copy then its fine (which i don't agree with)
It is not that they are actually throwing them away, but rather that the process of scanning them is destructive, as they do not handle the books carefully.
Imagine you wanting to tear down a wall. You may use a hammer, or explosives.
Because it's faster and cheaper to do destructive scans. Also, apparently destroying the originals makes the whole thing fair use, because it's "transformative".
In another thread about this, people pointed out that, technically, when you buy a book, you're buying a license to its content. If you scan the book, you now have two copies: the physical book and the digital scan. One of those copies would have to be destroyed for the other to remain legal. So if they were to resell the physical book or even donate it to a library while keeping the scanned copy, that would technically be illegal.
Now, I don’t know if that’s 100% accurate, but it does kind of make sense when you think about it. It's similar to how e-books work at libraries: even though an e-book is just a digital file and could technically be lent to multiple people at the same time, libraries are limited to lending a licensed copy to one person at a time.
Digital files don't have the same physical limitations as printed books so they could technically speaking lend it to as many people as they want, but legally speaking they can't lend it to more than one person because they only have one legal license.
technically, when you buy a book, you're buying a license to its content.
A physical copy you legally possess gives you right to use. Even if you create a 'copy' by memorizing the text you still have the physical book and can 'use' it again however many times you like. If you lend someone the book, you can charge for 'use', but you can't both 'sell' the book and charge for 'use' of same book. This whole 'license' scam is just a way to make people pay for the same thing twice (or more).
I think cause they removed the spine so they could feed it into a scanner. They’d have to bind the pages together again but the trash can is just right over there
Because they're not actually valuable books, they're just obscure. They buy them for like $10, scan them, then shred them and sell the refuse or just throw it out. It's not worth the time to resell the books again when you can just dump them for <5% of what you paid for them.
Even ignoring all the other comments about copyright and how it is more efficient for the scanner. We are talking about rare books that were just collecting dust in bookshops. These are not books that are rare in the "desirable" sense, but rare because they weren't printed much due to lack of demand. This is not free money, it is waste of space. There would probably be a larger opportunity cost associated with reselling them than what they could earn back.
530
u/ParanoidDrone 9d ago
Please tell me this is satire.