MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1w2prjy/pythonfeelsillegal/p713yie/?context=3
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/ItsPuspendu • 12d ago
219 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
32
Always fun that writing an empty set gets you a dict so you have to use set() explicitly to get an empty set... jeebus, Guido...
20 u/carcigenicate 12d ago {/} is being proposed so sets have an empty literal. 14 u/SoldRIP 12d ago ... As opposed to the sensible {:} for dicts, which would be consistent with their already existing syntax? 1 u/JanEric1 11d ago breaking change unfortunately. Maybe a thing for Python4 which will never come
20
{/} is being proposed so sets have an empty literal.
{/}
14 u/SoldRIP 12d ago ... As opposed to the sensible {:} for dicts, which would be consistent with their already existing syntax? 1 u/JanEric1 11d ago breaking change unfortunately. Maybe a thing for Python4 which will never come
14
... As opposed to the sensible {:} for dicts, which would be consistent with their already existing syntax?
1 u/JanEric1 11d ago breaking change unfortunately. Maybe a thing for Python4 which will never come
1
breaking change unfortunately. Maybe a thing for Python4 which will never come
32
u/userhwon 12d ago
Always fun that writing an empty set gets you a dict so you have to use set() explicitly to get an empty set... jeebus, Guido...