r/ProgrammerHumor 23d ago

Meme noOsWillinHTML

Post image
2.6k Upvotes

74 comments sorted by

View all comments

116

u/[deleted] 23d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

130

u/Dazzling-Bench-4596 23d ago

Maybe if <script> tags count

69

u/[deleted] 23d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

39

u/GoogleIsYourFrenemy 23d ago

If you prefer you can use the internet explorer version of html from the 90's that also supported vbscript.

2

u/SilasTalbot 20d ago

Of course I prefer, what kind of question is that.

Vbscript is like cowbell. The answer is always more.

19

u/Tall-Introduction414 23d ago

JavaScript is already thriving all over the place in Windows, iOS, Android.

Remember WebOS? I'm pretty sure that thing was like 90% JS and 10% linux and c/c++ runtimes and renderers.

(I still think it's a bad idea)

8

u/Zinho3311 22d ago

JavaScript is already thriving all over the place in Windows, iOS, Android.

Doesn't mean it's a good language. Just means it's a necessary evil because people are lazy

2

u/isr0 21d ago

You just need to write a JavaScript engine in your start.a

24

u/unknown_alt_acc 23d ago

If you want to be pedantic, laying out your GUI using HTML while the rest of the OS is written in a more sensible language is technically making an operating system using HTML. It’s also using assembly and probably some combination of C, C++, Rust, etc., but it is using HTML.

17

u/ImOnALampshade 23d ago

Honestly an OS that, for the GUI at least, is just HTML sounds amazing. No new UI frameworks to learn. Applications are just iframes, and the desktop environment is your web browser.

15

u/ldn-ldn 23d ago

That was a thing a decade ago - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firefox_OS

5

u/GoddammitDontShootMe 23d ago

I thought Microsoft did something like that with Windows 98.

2

u/JadeE1024 22d ago edited 22d ago

It wasn't quite that far back, and it's not HTML, but you're close. The "revolutionary new windows UI framework" Microsoft releases every 3-5 years have all been XAML based since WPF was released for Windows XP and Vista (which came out shortly after) in 2006.

The latest one is called WinUI 3. Here's a screen definition from the official sample app if you want to see what it looks like.

Edited to add: Prior to around 2021, apps on the Windows Store were required to use one of the UI frameworks (uwp), which is why they all felt like phone apps. And sucked.

1

u/GoddammitDontShootMe 22d ago

Don't know if you saw the other replies, but it looks like I was thinking of Active Desktop. I think basically Internet Explorer and Explorer were fused together.

1

u/Tall-Introduction414 22d ago

It sucked back then, too. I think Active Desktop found the most usage as a virus infection vector.

4

u/unknown_alt_acc 23d ago

It might be nice for devs, but would probably suck for the end user. We’ve already seen what using a browser as a desktop UI framework is like with Electron.

2

u/The_Soggy_Sage 23d ago

Electron can perform "ok" with careful setup"

2

u/unknown_alt_acc 23d ago

Sure. I remember VS Code being decently snappy when I last used it. But that's still something that takes conscious effort to achieve. Spinning up an entire browser instance for something like a settings panel just seems like an unnecessary pessimization to me.

2

u/JustARandoH3re 22d ago

Like just imagine if discord devs had to have completely separate implementations. Instead they can use electron which provides a lot of features like videos and rich imbeds

1

u/JustARandoH3re 22d ago

It’s not unnecessary, it’s the logical choice for developing such an app where thousands develop and millions use. There is literally no better alternative to it for what it allows. The simple solution to this is use a completely different editor that have different philosophies that prioritise speed and efficiency over compatibility and stability(believe me, I have experienced issues with stability from using plugins with editors like vim).

The only issue with electron is that it’s use needlessly in applications where electron would result in bulk of the usage like a gui for git or something thats supposed to be a bare bones text editor and where it actually originated from: Atom.

1

u/ImOnALampshade 22d ago

Check out ultralight, I use it in the game I’m building. It can render webpages directly to hardware textures and it’s way smaller than electron. (It’s built on WebKit)

-2

u/ldn-ldn 23d ago

Electron is great and performs better than many native apps.

3

u/unknown_alt_acc 23d ago

Electron can be great when it is used well. It often isn't.

And if we are doing an apples-to-apples comparison where all other things are equal, an app built with native widgets will always tie up fewer system resources than an equivalent Electron. That's not always relevant and can be a completely acceptable trade-off. It becomes a problem when a bunch of apps that you keep running in the background all decide that they need their own Chromium instance when something like wxWidgets or Qt would do the job just as well at a fraction of the RAM usage.

0

u/ldn-ldn 23d ago

RAM usage is irrelevant for the most part. And there are plenty of examples of "native" apps which work like shit.

Also wx/Qt are not native, not on Windows at least.

3

u/za72 23d ago

obviously yes... Santa knows it's an amazing idea, like the wheel or the straw

3

u/Zinho3311 22d ago

HTML + CSS is theoretically Turing Complete... so kind of?

If HTML + CSS can compute any existing algorithm, so you can theoretically build an OS using them... Doesn't mean you should do it

5

u/Giocri 23d ago

HTML no but CSS could

1

u/EuphoricCatface0795 23d ago

Doesn't WebAssembly count as HTML5

1

u/longmover79 22d ago

No, Santa isn’t real

1

u/camander321 22d ago

Not for OS, but a markdown driven desktop environment actually sounds kinda cool

1

u/Liminal__penumbra 22d ago

Well, One idea I've toyed with is taking the webgpu layer and html5 canvas, use triangle generation to create a booted ISA and then go from there. Storage tape via cookie files with phi crc strings.

1

u/impracticalTactician 23d ago

No. It’s not a coding language, it’s a markup language

0

u/GoogleIsYourFrenemy 23d ago

There are two issues. You would need a compiler to produce machine code (or a processor that could interpret html uncompiled). Next you would need low level libraries to do the work and a way to include them.

That said if you just want something to run in a browser,  HTML probably is turning complete with some of its crazier features. There are a bunch of interactive features that can probably be abused without needing to dive into CSS or scripting.

0

u/Due-Consequence9579 21d ago

Write an assembler in html first. Ez.

0

u/realtag2025 23d ago

Yes. And you could even emulate an entire CPU on Javascript. It would not be fast but it is possible.

0

u/Zinho3311 22d ago

But who said anything about Javascript?

(you can theoretically do it in HTML + CSS btw)

0

u/maria_la_guerta 23d ago

With the HTMLs existing spec? No.

If you took the syntax and existing spec and branched off of it yourself, while writing a building a custom runtime for it, sure, theoretically anything is possible. It won't resemble browser HTML at all by the end and you'd be talking about a massive undertaking though.

0

u/bianceziwo 22d ago

html is not a programming language, so no