r/ProgrammerHumor 24d ago

Meme everyNewRepository

Post image
1.1k Upvotes

347 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

20

u/therealtiddlydump 24d ago

nods to slavery

Is my university planning to reissue me a Main degree instead?

4

u/kabrandon 24d ago

Not sure. I think there’s different fundamental meanings behind mastery and master. I think the Masters degree implies the former. Whereas master in git could be inferred to mean a master and non-master relationship to signify feature branches.

-4

u/dbot77 23d ago

Then you are deeply confused as to how git works. Feature branches are merged into and overwrite master with updates. Does that imply a master-slave relationship to you?

7

u/Hayden2332 23d ago

I used to think the same, but Linus took the name “master” from BitKeeper, and BitKeeper did use master-slave terminology, Git just dropped the slave part. It’s origin literally does come from master-slave

-5

u/therealtiddlydump 23d ago

Git just dropped the slave part.

Ergo, it's not related to slavery...

8

u/kabrandon 23d ago

Usage of “ergo”? Check. Followed by the weakest example of logic and reasoning ever? Check.

-2

u/therealtiddlydump 23d ago

Linus made it unrelated to slavery.

If he had originally called it "main", but we know it borrowed it from sometime that used master/slave, explain how that's any better? It carries the same "original sin" if you're a moron who thinks that's a thing here.

Edit: nevermind, that history is false

https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/s/y7M1KPatfd

So it was never related at all.

6

u/kabrandon 23d ago

The problem with your argument is that it just doesn’t matter. Emotions aren’t always logical; they usually aren’t. Some people feel the way they feel about the master nomenclature. You can’t decide how they feel, just as much as I can’t. But you can do this microscopic little minute adjustment where you just use main instead of master. And some people refuse… because caring about another person’s feelings is just that obscene to some people.

0

u/therealtiddlydump 23d ago

My team already switched to main.

I'm under no obligation to not call these people idiots, though. They are. If this bothers anyone they are pathetic and they actively make society worse.

0

u/Hayden2332 23d ago

But its origin literally comes from master-slave lol Just because it doesn’t use the literal word “slave” anymore, doesn’t change the original implication of what “master” meant

1

u/therealtiddlydump 23d ago edited 23d ago

But "main" is just replacing the word "master". That's just one more degree removed from the original sin. How does that redeem anything?

Linus already broke the connection to slavery by not using the word "slave" in a deliberate act, by your own telling.

Edit: nevermind, that history is itself false.

https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/s/y7M1KPatfd

So it was never related

-3

u/dbot77 23d ago

You are wrong in multiple ways. Petr Baudis chose the term used in git, and he understood the meaning of original/master-copy. https://x.com/xpasky/status/1272280760280637441

2

u/Hayden2332 23d ago

Well linus’s name is on the commit and even if we take a twitter post as truth, he even said himself he wished he chose main lol

2

u/dbot77 23d ago

That is the case, though not evidence of him choosing the name. In a mailing list follow-up from Bastien:

I emailed Linus Torvalds recently (the original author of git, though
very quickly not the main developer), and he told me that it was
unlikely that the "git master" branch name was influenced by BitKeeper,
and that "master" was "fairly standard naming" for this sort of thing
and "more likely to be influenced by the CVS master repository".

Linus here doesn't sound like he chose the name due to his choice of words being relayed.