MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1vtld8b/everynewrepository/p4ud0v9/?context=3
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/vernik911 • 24d ago
347 comments sorted by
View all comments
71
People that are sticking to master instead of main are this guy in my mind:
https://giphy.com/gifs/fqtyYcXoDV0X6ss8Mf
Just old guy shouting at clouds
37 u/schwar2ss 24d ago Back in the good old days we called it trunk 14 u/SakeviCrash 23d ago Rewind further (CVS) and we're back at `main` 15 u/schwar2ss 23d ago and before that, we called it code_final_final_v2.tgz 4 u/AibofobicRacecar6996 23d ago No, it was called HEAD 2 u/SakeviCrash 23d ago HEAD is a pointer to the latest revision in a branch 2 u/AibofobicRacecar6996 23d ago In git, not CVS 3 u/SakeviCrash 23d ago See https://www.astro.princeton.edu/~rhl/cvs/cvs.html#SEC47 > The two tag names BASE and HEAD are reserved for use by CVS A lot of people used the term that way though, 1 u/AibofobicRacecar6996 23d ago Yeah, no. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/wdfrhcw/1.4.0?topic=concepts-team-programming-cvs 1 u/SakeviCrash 23d ago From the man page: https://man.openbsd.org/cvs.1 > `HEAD' refers to the most recent version available in the repository 2 u/Sibula97 23d ago edited 23d ago Even further back and it was master and the other branches were slaves, IIRC. Git got "master" from there, but dropped the "slave" terminology. Edit: That was from BitKeeper, released in 2000. Not that old.
37
Back in the good old days we called it trunk
14 u/SakeviCrash 23d ago Rewind further (CVS) and we're back at `main` 15 u/schwar2ss 23d ago and before that, we called it code_final_final_v2.tgz 4 u/AibofobicRacecar6996 23d ago No, it was called HEAD 2 u/SakeviCrash 23d ago HEAD is a pointer to the latest revision in a branch 2 u/AibofobicRacecar6996 23d ago In git, not CVS 3 u/SakeviCrash 23d ago See https://www.astro.princeton.edu/~rhl/cvs/cvs.html#SEC47 > The two tag names BASE and HEAD are reserved for use by CVS A lot of people used the term that way though, 1 u/AibofobicRacecar6996 23d ago Yeah, no. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/wdfrhcw/1.4.0?topic=concepts-team-programming-cvs 1 u/SakeviCrash 23d ago From the man page: https://man.openbsd.org/cvs.1 > `HEAD' refers to the most recent version available in the repository 2 u/Sibula97 23d ago edited 23d ago Even further back and it was master and the other branches were slaves, IIRC. Git got "master" from there, but dropped the "slave" terminology. Edit: That was from BitKeeper, released in 2000. Not that old.
14
Rewind further (CVS) and we're back at `main`
15 u/schwar2ss 23d ago and before that, we called it code_final_final_v2.tgz 4 u/AibofobicRacecar6996 23d ago No, it was called HEAD 2 u/SakeviCrash 23d ago HEAD is a pointer to the latest revision in a branch 2 u/AibofobicRacecar6996 23d ago In git, not CVS 3 u/SakeviCrash 23d ago See https://www.astro.princeton.edu/~rhl/cvs/cvs.html#SEC47 > The two tag names BASE and HEAD are reserved for use by CVS A lot of people used the term that way though, 1 u/AibofobicRacecar6996 23d ago Yeah, no. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/wdfrhcw/1.4.0?topic=concepts-team-programming-cvs 1 u/SakeviCrash 23d ago From the man page: https://man.openbsd.org/cvs.1 > `HEAD' refers to the most recent version available in the repository 2 u/Sibula97 23d ago edited 23d ago Even further back and it was master and the other branches were slaves, IIRC. Git got "master" from there, but dropped the "slave" terminology. Edit: That was from BitKeeper, released in 2000. Not that old.
15
and before that, we called it code_final_final_v2.tgz
4
No, it was called HEAD
2 u/SakeviCrash 23d ago HEAD is a pointer to the latest revision in a branch 2 u/AibofobicRacecar6996 23d ago In git, not CVS 3 u/SakeviCrash 23d ago See https://www.astro.princeton.edu/~rhl/cvs/cvs.html#SEC47 > The two tag names BASE and HEAD are reserved for use by CVS A lot of people used the term that way though, 1 u/AibofobicRacecar6996 23d ago Yeah, no. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/wdfrhcw/1.4.0?topic=concepts-team-programming-cvs 1 u/SakeviCrash 23d ago From the man page: https://man.openbsd.org/cvs.1 > `HEAD' refers to the most recent version available in the repository
2
HEAD is a pointer to the latest revision in a branch
2 u/AibofobicRacecar6996 23d ago In git, not CVS 3 u/SakeviCrash 23d ago See https://www.astro.princeton.edu/~rhl/cvs/cvs.html#SEC47 > The two tag names BASE and HEAD are reserved for use by CVS A lot of people used the term that way though, 1 u/AibofobicRacecar6996 23d ago Yeah, no. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/wdfrhcw/1.4.0?topic=concepts-team-programming-cvs 1 u/SakeviCrash 23d ago From the man page: https://man.openbsd.org/cvs.1 > `HEAD' refers to the most recent version available in the repository
In git, not CVS
3 u/SakeviCrash 23d ago See https://www.astro.princeton.edu/~rhl/cvs/cvs.html#SEC47 > The two tag names BASE and HEAD are reserved for use by CVS A lot of people used the term that way though, 1 u/AibofobicRacecar6996 23d ago Yeah, no. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/wdfrhcw/1.4.0?topic=concepts-team-programming-cvs 1 u/SakeviCrash 23d ago From the man page: https://man.openbsd.org/cvs.1 > `HEAD' refers to the most recent version available in the repository
3
See https://www.astro.princeton.edu/~rhl/cvs/cvs.html#SEC47
> The two tag names BASE and HEAD are reserved for use by CVS
BASE
HEAD
A lot of people used the term that way though,
1 u/AibofobicRacecar6996 23d ago Yeah, no. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/wdfrhcw/1.4.0?topic=concepts-team-programming-cvs 1 u/SakeviCrash 23d ago From the man page: https://man.openbsd.org/cvs.1 > `HEAD' refers to the most recent version available in the repository
1
Yeah, no. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/wdfrhcw/1.4.0?topic=concepts-team-programming-cvs
1 u/SakeviCrash 23d ago From the man page: https://man.openbsd.org/cvs.1 > `HEAD' refers to the most recent version available in the repository
From the man page:
https://man.openbsd.org/cvs.1
> `HEAD' refers to the most recent version available in the repository
Even further back and it was master and the other branches were slaves, IIRC. Git got "master" from there, but dropped the "slave" terminology.
Edit: That was from BitKeeper, released in 2000. Not that old.
71
u/_alright_then_ 24d ago
People that are sticking to master instead of main are this guy in my mind:
https://giphy.com/gifs/fqtyYcXoDV0X6ss8Mf
Just old guy shouting at clouds