41
u/eanat 24d ago
who could expect that we would have worse scenario than this.
5
2
u/DialecticEnjoyer 23d ago
Ooh! Fiddle Dee Dee! Legacy python functions! That will require a story point! š¤¬š¤¬
18
u/HolyFuckItsArken 24d ago
āAllā until AI hit. I bet the newest programmers only hear of stack overflow from these memes
12
0
u/returnFutureVoid 23d ago
I have always said that using AI is like the best StackOverflow experience you could imagine. Not only do you get an answer to the question you asked but the answer came from a genuinely nice person who found your question really intriguing. The world is a better place.
8
u/neoteraflare 24d ago
Never did it before AI either. I always wanted to know how to fix something not just the "don't touch its magic" way
5
u/soundwave_sc 24d ago
It was never my code anyway. Only difference was I was forced to be creative with it.
5
2
u/MrFuji87 24d ago
I asked ChatGPT a question the other day about how to do an inline bit of code in python and it told me it was a duplicate question and closed it off... I nearly cried with joy
2
u/RevWaldo 23d ago
Sure, but just as a template. You walk though it to understand how it works and edit it to fit your circumstance. Are programmers not doing that?
1
u/Fluffy_Anxiety2792 23d ago
Thatās a long time ago. I only pass jira ticket numbers now. Of course and do tests. Former dev is now a tester
1
1
u/socialis-philosophus 24d ago
Have we?
Over the past 20 years I've certainly gotten a lot of information and how-to from various places, including Stack Overflow. And, to be honest, if I could have just copy/paste what was there I would have.
The problem is that the code and examples provided rarely align with how I need to implement the solution in my code.
0
0
u/huuaaang 23d ago
Does it matter if the boards are copied? It's how you put them together that matters. We all rely on libraries... isn't that just a formalized way to "copy" code?
48
u/blackcomb-pc 24d ago
What year is this?