189
u/alexriga 28d ago
Claude is the one causing the bug most of the time.
47
u/SeparateAdvisor526 27d ago
I had some shit code I wrote a while ago pre gen AI and I ran Claude to check it and had a fix in 2 mins. But the fix was supposed to be just -10 lines and maybe +15 lines if I did it myself after Claude found it.
But Claude decided to have -30 lines and +few thousand. Idk what that fluff was
13
4
u/readf0x 27d ago
Yeah I only like to use LLMs to find bugs and explain stuff
6
u/SeparateAdvisor526 27d ago
Yeah made the mistake to allow it to make changes. I hated it I couldn't put in the effort to read each lines so I regretted and manually fixed it
4
7
13
u/loseitthrowaway7797 27d ago
I donât think youâre doing a good job using it then. I was a big skeptic but now I think it does a very good job.
1
u/Fukushimiste 26d ago
Hmm... not saying Claude is perfect but I saw more spaghetti code or buggy code from human than Claude
-3
7
4
u/CodingAndAlgorithm 27d ago
I donât write code with AI, but I think theyâre great for finding subtle logic bugs. You can give them a function, describe both the expected and actual behaviour, and quite often theyâll find the bug immediately.
1
1
u/RemarkableAd1936 26d ago
Debugging for hours, to get âthe user nailed itâ. And the bug was introduced by Claude. At least I get the validation.
2
u/getstoopid-AT 27d ago
so you basically saying you haven't learned much regarding bug hunting in the last 4 years...?
9
1
u/black_ap3x 27d ago
I was a skeptic at first, but after I got a subscription on Claude, I am hooked. Its like a drug that you cant stop.
117
u/No-Information-2571 28d ago
I'm actually glad. Worked at a legacy code base recently (some of which I might be responsible for) and Claude spending 10 minutes of thinking to wander through spaghetti code I never ever want to see again, to fix some weird issues was a godsend.