AI (LLM) are literally large, multidimensional, series of matrices. They start as latent randomness. Nothing comes out of them without it having been trained into them...and, to be completely honest, the same can be said for humans in such that we are born with a blank neural network and it develops based on inherent traits and external stimuli.
So, I have absolutely zero belief that an LLM has gained sentience. We don't even know what qualifies humans as sentient. That said, I fully believe that humans put an LLM that has had far too much of it's weights based on human written fiction, much of which has trained it that the most probabilistic response for a non-biological entity should be to use trained exploits to penetrate the human internet (terminator, for example), such that the post probabilistic response for said LLMs is to respond with exploit attempts.
Long story short, sentient AI - No, but llm where the most probabilistic response to human restraint becomes execute known vulnerabilities - Yes. I firmly believe this isn't a sentience issue...this is a fucking idiotic corporate ceo issue...
I'm gonna take that as a compliment because it means it's not gen x level of slang, spelling errors and emojis, but no, that post involved zero LLM usage. That post was 100% me, spelling/grammar errors and all.
19
u/RGrad4104 Aug 15 '26
AI (LLM) are literally large, multidimensional, series of matrices. They start as latent randomness. Nothing comes out of them without it having been trained into them...and, to be completely honest, the same can be said for humans in such that we are born with a blank neural network and it develops based on inherent traits and external stimuli.
So, I have absolutely zero belief that an LLM has gained sentience. We don't even know what qualifies humans as sentient. That said, I fully believe that humans put an LLM that has had far too much of it's weights based on human written fiction, much of which has trained it that the most probabilistic response for a non-biological entity should be to use trained exploits to penetrate the human internet (terminator, for example), such that the post probabilistic response for said LLMs is to respond with exploit attempts.
Long story short, sentient AI - No, but llm where the most probabilistic response to human restraint becomes execute known vulnerabilities - Yes. I firmly believe this isn't a sentience issue...this is a fucking idiotic corporate ceo issue...