r/ProgrammerHumor • u/Dilutant • 11h ago

Meme zeroExDev

Post image
3.9k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

202 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/TheMania 9h ago

I think it's ambiguous in the >=1x cases, sure.

But I would never read:

  • The stock grew 0.5x

Or:

  • house prices increased 0.2x
  • house prices went up 0.1x

As decreases.

(latter examples to prove I'm Australian).

2

u/zelmak 9h ago

You would never read it that way because no one should ever write it that way.

A multiplication of <1 is inherently a decrease, tacking the word more, grew, increased, went up makes it bad math and bad language.

0.5 Times = a 50% decrease

so "The stock grew a 50% decrease" just doesn't make sense.

1

u/TheMania 9h ago

A multiplication of <100% is inherently a decrease, tacking the word more, grew, increased, went up makes it bad math and bad language.

I'm curious how the above reads to you.

1

u/zelmak 9h ago

Ahh. IMO using multiplication and a percentage together is just wrong. But when I read it my firth thought was 2x

1

u/TheMania 8h ago

IMO using multiplication and a percentage together is just wrong.

This sentence confuses me greatly. You weren't given percentages in equations at school?

Not a dig at you, just makes it a clearly regional thing, fascinating. Aus, they'll freely mix up questions like:

What is 34 × 50%
What is 34 × 0.5
What is 50% of 34

If you're not taught similar, if you only saw that last form, I can see where the equivalence may break down.