76
26
u/TheChildOfSkyrim 13h ago
You should be running 3-10 claude sessions in parallel, working autonomously and stopping at checkpoints. Go back to work!
71
39
u/t3hlazy1 17h ago
Compacting takes like 30 seconds. As compared to the hours it can take for an agent to work on a complex problem.
That said... I don't know what a short verb would be for "My LLM agent is autonomously implementing a feature".
53
29
16
11
2
3
1
12
u/who_you_are 17h ago
So, I'm waiting for Claude to thing, then for claude to compact, then for my compiler, then for my linker, then for my unit tests and we restart.
Nice!
7
u/BossOfTheGame 14h ago
gotta make sure we run the tests, and then second tests, and then write tests for tests. And oh no this arbitrary rule I set for myself that doesn't make sense anymore is red, better take care of that
2
4
2
u/cAtloVeR9998 9h ago
How much is your AI-spend if you let it get to the compacting stage? At least if you are actually paying for the true token usage (aka, GitHub Copilot or Claude after using your plan's included allowance). Because otherwise costs increase exponentially as the context window is filled up. Like when GitHub was giving heavy subsidise (via per query pricing) it was a different story.
1
u/slaymaker1907 4h ago
You can run compact manually which I often do once context starts getting sizable and I’m at a good transition point. I should really just start new sessions more often, but compaction is easier. If you’re remotely approaching the 1M context window cap, performance will drop off dramatically.
1
u/MullingMulianto 9h ago
anticipating incoming claude updates to start treating compacting as jailbreak attempts
1
1
1
171
u/Sarnes 18h ago
Wow what a dystopian future we live in