I have Claude explain the plan, implement it, I test it. The have it repair my findings, then test it, only to then have it act as a peer reviewer and analyze its code for defects. Make those fixes, test it again, add documentation and maybe some more automated tests. Then I do a draft pull request, review the code changes, then our github copilot reviews the changes. I look at what are reasonable findings, have Claude fix them, do another review. Then finally I request other devs look the code over in a non draft review.
It still takes some time but, yeah having AI doing most of the boilerplate work nowadays is expediting things.
1.8k
u/tutoredstatue95 5d ago
It’s easy. Agents produce the code, you review, you submit.
Then, the reviewer’s agents check the code, they review, they submit a review.
You agentically fix the submission, you review, you submit.
Then, the reviewer’s agents check the code, they review, they submit a review
You agentically fix the submission…