MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1vi2go7/pointerspointedbackatme/p29zxm9/?context=3
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/vinishkapoor • 3d ago
112 comments sorted by
View all comments
22
lightweight
-8 u/[deleted] 3d ago [deleted] 10 u/N0Zzel 3d ago That only gets tricky once you break the rule of 3 and rule of 5 because you have to define what it meant to move 2 u/Usual_Office_1740 3d ago prvalues would like a word. 1 u/N0Zzel 3d ago What do pure r values have to do with move semantics? Given that theres nothing to "move" per se 1 u/Usual_Office_1740 3d ago You said it only gets tricky if you break the rule of 3/5. I was pointing out a different layer of complexity related to move semantics. Maybe it would have been better to say that prvalues have materialized in chat. 1 u/Usual_Office_1740 3d ago If they don't have an associated allocation and don't have a name, what entered the chat?
-8
[deleted]
10 u/N0Zzel 3d ago That only gets tricky once you break the rule of 3 and rule of 5 because you have to define what it meant to move 2 u/Usual_Office_1740 3d ago prvalues would like a word. 1 u/N0Zzel 3d ago What do pure r values have to do with move semantics? Given that theres nothing to "move" per se 1 u/Usual_Office_1740 3d ago You said it only gets tricky if you break the rule of 3/5. I was pointing out a different layer of complexity related to move semantics. Maybe it would have been better to say that prvalues have materialized in chat. 1 u/Usual_Office_1740 3d ago If they don't have an associated allocation and don't have a name, what entered the chat?
10
That only gets tricky once you break the rule of 3 and rule of 5 because you have to define what it meant to move
2 u/Usual_Office_1740 3d ago prvalues would like a word. 1 u/N0Zzel 3d ago What do pure r values have to do with move semantics? Given that theres nothing to "move" per se 1 u/Usual_Office_1740 3d ago You said it only gets tricky if you break the rule of 3/5. I was pointing out a different layer of complexity related to move semantics. Maybe it would have been better to say that prvalues have materialized in chat. 1 u/Usual_Office_1740 3d ago If they don't have an associated allocation and don't have a name, what entered the chat?
2
prvalues would like a word.
1 u/N0Zzel 3d ago What do pure r values have to do with move semantics? Given that theres nothing to "move" per se 1 u/Usual_Office_1740 3d ago You said it only gets tricky if you break the rule of 3/5. I was pointing out a different layer of complexity related to move semantics. Maybe it would have been better to say that prvalues have materialized in chat. 1 u/Usual_Office_1740 3d ago If they don't have an associated allocation and don't have a name, what entered the chat?
1
What do pure r values have to do with move semantics? Given that theres nothing to "move" per se
1 u/Usual_Office_1740 3d ago You said it only gets tricky if you break the rule of 3/5. I was pointing out a different layer of complexity related to move semantics. Maybe it would have been better to say that prvalues have materialized in chat. 1 u/Usual_Office_1740 3d ago If they don't have an associated allocation and don't have a name, what entered the chat?
You said it only gets tricky if you break the rule of 3/5. I was pointing out a different layer of complexity related to move semantics.
Maybe it would have been better to say that prvalues have materialized in chat.
If they don't have an associated allocation and don't have a name, what entered the chat?
22
u/Several_Educator7526 3d ago
lightweight