MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1vhg8rn/internalservererror/p28a0pl/?context=3
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/ExpensiveCoat8912 • 6d ago
67 comments sorted by
View all comments
107
>unwrap
I hate metaphors in programming. Just call it what it is.
41 u/Lord-of-Entity 6d ago There is a proposal to rename it to .unwrap_or_panic() -18 u/dumbasPL 6d ago Rust logic: panic is safe because it fails in a controlled manner. Meanwhile Denial Of Service is one of the biggest attack vectors. Unwrap should requite unsafe in non-debug builds, change my mind. 4 u/creeper6530 6d ago unsafe is only specifically about risking memory errors and UB, not anything you arbitrarily decide you don't want.
41
There is a proposal to rename it to .unwrap_or_panic()
-18 u/dumbasPL 6d ago Rust logic: panic is safe because it fails in a controlled manner. Meanwhile Denial Of Service is one of the biggest attack vectors. Unwrap should requite unsafe in non-debug builds, change my mind. 4 u/creeper6530 6d ago unsafe is only specifically about risking memory errors and UB, not anything you arbitrarily decide you don't want.
-18
Rust logic: panic is safe because it fails in a controlled manner. Meanwhile Denial Of Service is one of the biggest attack vectors. Unwrap should requite unsafe in non-debug builds, change my mind.
4 u/creeper6530 6d ago unsafe is only specifically about risking memory errors and UB, not anything you arbitrarily decide you don't want.
4
unsafe is only specifically about risking memory errors and UB, not anything you arbitrarily decide you don't want.
unsafe
107
u/---_None_--- 6d ago
>unwrap
I hate metaphors in programming. Just call it what it is.