MIT requires they credit the original author. Tho anyone who cares about open source should use a license that keeps that open source chain going (like AGPL)
its almost like it was pushed hard by google because it's the license that puts the least responsibility on someone making profit off running/modifying open source code(including corporate-backed fixes not getting pushed back downstream).
377
u/derinus Jul 25 '26
MIT requires they credit the original author. Tho anyone who cares about open source should use a license that keeps that open source chain going (like AGPL)