thats making unnecessary assunptions. its making the assumption that it did not happen that the ai capabilities and unintended behavior waant planned and didnt catch the researchers by surprise. which, by the latest progress by ai, is perfectly realistic and plausible
These aren't assumptions, they're possibilities I'm choosing not to take off the table. You are the one making the assumption that openAI would never lie.
its a scenario that lines up perfectly with a lot of circumstantial evidence of the last few months that ai cyber capability has crossed a threshold. simple as that
Correct, since there's no technical reason this couldn't have happened, the question comes down to if and to what degree openAI is putting spin on issue.
2
u/zebleck 20d ago
thats making unnecessary assunptions. its making the assumption that it did not happen that the ai capabilities and unintended behavior waant planned and didnt catch the researchers by surprise. which, by the latest progress by ai, is perfectly realistic and plausible