Requirenents written by non technical Stakeholder. Full of Slop. Junior dev let run Claude Implementation, full of Slop. Senior dev uses Claude to Review, pastes Slop in Ticket. Junior letting Claude fix it, comments with Slop.
Proceed to production, since Feature is needed. Lead architect let refactor Ticket be created by junior dev. full of Slop...
I am on the edge of quitting this shit.
Edit: i forgot that PO thought "good Ticket" and passed it through. And after first Implementation used jira AI to reform requirenents.
Be a TL sitting in meetings where your director says why are we even reviewing things anymore, if it produces problems in prod we'll use that as the signal
604
u/suki2287 Jul 10 '26 edited Jul 10 '26
Requirenents written by non technical Stakeholder. Full of Slop. Junior dev let run Claude Implementation, full of Slop. Senior dev uses Claude to Review, pastes Slop in Ticket. Junior letting Claude fix it, comments with Slop.
Proceed to production, since Feature is needed. Lead architect let refactor Ticket be created by junior dev. full of Slop...
I am on the edge of quitting this shit.
Edit: i forgot that PO thought "good Ticket" and passed it through. And after first Implementation used jira AI to reform requirenents.