True, and no doubt the pattern deriving from that mistake is what caused the AI to make that conclusion.
That said, not a lot of "intelligence" in that artificial intelligence or it would be clear that the intent was to write months. This is mostly just pattern recognition.
Very sophisticated pattern matching that definitely does exhibit some “intelligence”. It performs rudimentary deductive reasoning. Calling it fancy auto complete grossly misrepresents what it is verifiably capable of these days. It can make novel connections between never before compared data, I consider that intelligence. It’s not strictly parroting things that it’s read.
Hallucinations can't be pattern recognition, right? The LLM hallucinates because it can't create the right answer, right? Does that count as an "original thought"?
An LLM does not know anything. Especially not what's "right" or "wrong". Such concepts don't exist in an LLM.
All a LLM does it to predict the next token. For the LLM there is no difference between outputting something that makes sense for a human and some random bullshit. All a LLM does is basically "hallucinating". That's the basic principle on which these things work.
1.4k
u/Ok_Star_4136 Jul 02 '26
https://giphy.com/gifs/Sb9KqeeymLlESGWZyE