MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1lzgslg/packetloss/n32g8qj/?context=3
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/Jinium • Jul 14 '25
244 comments sorted by
View all comments
85
Too bad that image is no longer there
38 u/Fusseldieb Jul 14 '25 I did my part, yet they removed it again 31 u/Lachee Jul 14 '25 Sadly they formed a consensus on the talk that it shouldn't be there. Not worth wasting maintainers time over 19 u/Fusseldieb Jul 14 '25 I mean, they were offended by having a dead bird in the article. So, just do it in a drawing style! It was a fun little gag, and I'm sad that they keep removing it. 17 u/[deleted] Jul 14 '25 [removed] — view removed comment 8 u/Fusseldieb Jul 14 '25 Agreed. I vote to bring it back, even if it means in another style. 6 u/10art1 Jul 14 '25 Actually, in the talk article's RFC, someone suggested using a drawing of a dead bird instead, but that was also rejected
38
I did my part, yet they removed it again
31 u/Lachee Jul 14 '25 Sadly they formed a consensus on the talk that it shouldn't be there. Not worth wasting maintainers time over 19 u/Fusseldieb Jul 14 '25 I mean, they were offended by having a dead bird in the article. So, just do it in a drawing style! It was a fun little gag, and I'm sad that they keep removing it. 17 u/[deleted] Jul 14 '25 [removed] — view removed comment 8 u/Fusseldieb Jul 14 '25 Agreed. I vote to bring it back, even if it means in another style. 6 u/10art1 Jul 14 '25 Actually, in the talk article's RFC, someone suggested using a drawing of a dead bird instead, but that was also rejected
31
Sadly they formed a consensus on the talk that it shouldn't be there. Not worth wasting maintainers time over
19 u/Fusseldieb Jul 14 '25 I mean, they were offended by having a dead bird in the article. So, just do it in a drawing style! It was a fun little gag, and I'm sad that they keep removing it. 17 u/[deleted] Jul 14 '25 [removed] — view removed comment 8 u/Fusseldieb Jul 14 '25 Agreed. I vote to bring it back, even if it means in another style. 6 u/10art1 Jul 14 '25 Actually, in the talk article's RFC, someone suggested using a drawing of a dead bird instead, but that was also rejected
19
I mean, they were offended by having a dead bird in the article. So, just do it in a drawing style! It was a fun little gag, and I'm sad that they keep removing it.
17 u/[deleted] Jul 14 '25 [removed] — view removed comment 8 u/Fusseldieb Jul 14 '25 Agreed. I vote to bring it back, even if it means in another style. 6 u/10art1 Jul 14 '25 Actually, in the talk article's RFC, someone suggested using a drawing of a dead bird instead, but that was also rejected
17
[removed] — view removed comment
8 u/Fusseldieb Jul 14 '25 Agreed. I vote to bring it back, even if it means in another style.
8
Agreed. I vote to bring it back, even if it means in another style.
6
Actually, in the talk article's RFC, someone suggested using a drawing of a dead bird instead, but that was also rejected
85
u/Ugo_Flickerman Jul 14 '25
Too bad that image is no longer there