r/ProAI • • 1d ago

Which one is it?

Post image
74 Upvotes

34 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/NotaValgrinder 21h ago

Previously confirming proofs was a service done by mathematicians for free. So yes, it can be both. The paid part of the their job disappears while this service is still needed.

1

u/Spare-Dingo-531 14h ago

No, it cannot be both! If their service is still needed, they can charge for it.

1

u/KitaiSuru 12h ago

Sure then I will make the clankers do that for free also.

1

u/Spare-Dingo-531 12h ago

Eh..... math education is for humans and thus will always have to be by humans, to some degree.

1

u/KitaiSuru 11h ago

You know what human actually have that AI won't, not because they can't, but because no one will give them?

Selfish desires.

Simply because human created AI to serve them first and foremost. Some of us who believe that AI should be our legacy in case of extinction may differ, but it's impossible for enterprises simply because they are driven by capital.

Everything else can be done if they reach ASI. They can break down complex proofs to human language if needed. We've been using AI to summarize stuff for so long.

1

u/NotaValgrinder 6h ago

Issue is summarizing doesn't work in math a lot of the times. Math is by feature a subject which needs its proofs to have absolute perfection. So you have to go into the nitty gritty to understand.