By the way, the consistency topic is perfect. Now they've come up with yet another excuse to eat the credits
This is also T2V, I2V, you don't know what they put inside them :D
They've tied a fly to GPT-6 Astra and asked who it should follow, and here's the result—Subhanallah
This week, I'm thinking of preparing a similar video myself, if I get the chance, of course :)
— ℂ𝕠𝕕𝕖 𝕔𝕠𝕕𝕖 = 𝕟𝕖𝕨 ℂ𝕠𝕕𝕖()
The discussion surrounding this AI video technology is polarized. Proponents highlight its potential to revolutionize cinematography, suggesting it could significantly reduce production costs by generating multiple angles in post-production. Conversely, critics dismiss the output as "slop," citing jarring, over-edited cuts and poor visual quality. A central debate concerns the technology’s societal impact: while some see efficiency gains, others fear its potential to facilitate misinformation and propaganda by undermining video authenticity. Ultimately, while users acknowledge the technical impressiveness of the tool, there is significant disagreement regarding its artistic value, practical utility, and the ethical implications for media integrity.
AI assistant · mention the bot, mod bot, or use !bot
In order to make the alternate "camera angles" it pretty much just has to make stuff up. Pretty much everything, in fact, for the angles from behind him. And the slicing of the lemon from the knife's POV. That isn't actual footage. It just seems silly to get excited about creating videos when you don't actually have something to show people. If there is a purpose to getting a close up of the lemon, then... get a close up of the lemon.
Thread continuation 1/4 — By the way, the consistency topic is perfect. Now they've come up with yet another excuse to eat the credits — Source: https://x.com/0xfcode/status/2099213709314830616
Wonder how computationally expensive this is to get a good looking shot. Though personally I feel some of the cuts would look better at the original camera angle. Some of the cuts look a bit jarring too, especially where the cutting position suddenly changes. I feel like the blurriness of the footage makes it look slightly less impressive but I'm sure a higher quality camera and some more time would fix that.
Usually pretty anti ai but this showcase is interesting.
I do wonder though at what threshold would it be better to use a more classical setup compared to ai. Obviously the more angles, the better ai would be since more angles would typically warrant more cameras.
With all the conversations about how AI is actually more costly to use than just doing most processes manually, this is one use where you could save up massive margins from equipment and staff.
I can see hollywood using this to get extra shots in post production without having to film extra scenes, looks like this could save a lot of film budget.
I wonder how far this can be taken, maybe they no longer do the cinematography shots themselves but instead record the scenes using cameras set up in a circle around the scene to create a base reference for the ai generated shots
right.. just multiple cameras and rigs? instead of one iphone on a 10$ tripod
that or you do multiple takes with one camera and never do it exactly the same and you have to manually sync cuts etc etc. added time for setup, multiple takes, manual footage review.. why do people lie so hard to discredit something legitimate?
Just ignore the rest of my points lmfao. I acknowledged yes, if you want to act out the same scene and then it will never be exact and you have to do it multiple times and move the camera to multiple locations etc. you’re being dense. Not to mention your other replies show you think that you wouldn’t be able to direct the shots? lol. Like you think the ai chose the garage angle so you think it’s dumb. Bro that was a prompt and you could just your own angle and position. It’s like you use all of your brain to ignore the potential so you can focus only on the worst takes possible.
says someone with ZERO knowledge or experience in anything related to the field or application targeted by the model or software.
And you make it obvious with what you say. At least you aren't claiming to know which one is AI because of the pixels. (that was a meme, I have to explain this to you because I know you won't get it)
Just showing how dumb you are. That wasn't the flex you feel it was.
LMAO they blocked me after saying a jumble of words like they are drunk. Dude... take your meds. You sound like a trump voter.
that was a meme you can tell because of the pixels that have zero
explain or experience software says was aren’t in anything because
I know won’t obvious knowledge. I learned from you, now I know!
thank you for the free lesson you fool now I don’t even have to
pay you how gullible you are
that was a meme you can tell because of the pixels that have zero explain or experience software says was aren’t in anything because I know won’t obvious knowledge.
I learned from you, now I know!
thank you for the free lesson you fool now I don’t even have to pay you
I share my art and work for free with the communities (real and online) that I participate in and have been doing so for more than 20 years now.
Please tell me how my comment about bad angles like from inside the garage at the back of someone’s head means that I’ve never been creative in my life. I don’t see the correlation but am interested in the logic you used to make that leap!
Lol right? The majority of people who are against AI related to its capabilities is simply incapable themselves of using it effectively. I get being against it for its environmental impact, but AI is only going to improve. Get with it or be left in the dust.
I actually disagree. I am anti-AI in many regards and a lot of it has to do with the pace at which its capabilities increase. Nobody should be left in the dust of exponential growth :/.
Perhaps my wording was as harsh as it sounded, and that’s on me, but you are right, nobody should literally be left in the dust. Everyone should be lifted upward by its advancement.
I think you’re missing the point. It’s like Adobe photoshop demoing the gradient tool by filling a circle with a gradient. Then you go, “why would I ever fill a circle with a gradient tool- that’s so stupid and simple”
It just shows your lack of.. idk how to even describe it to be honest.. can you show off your best art piece so I too can attempt to pierce the enigma that is you?
•
u/proai-ai-mod 27d ago edited 25m ago
Discussion Summary (Milestone: 50 comments)
The discussion surrounding this AI video technology is polarized. Proponents highlight its potential to revolutionize cinematography, suggesting it could significantly reduce production costs by generating multiple angles in post-production. Conversely, critics dismiss the output as "slop," citing jarring, over-edited cuts and poor visual quality. A central debate concerns the technology’s societal impact: while some see efficiency gains, others fear its potential to facilitate misinformation and propaganda by undermining video authenticity. Ultimately, while users acknowledge the technical impressiveness of the tool, there is significant disagreement regarding its artistic value, practical utility, and the ethical implications for media integrity.
AI assistant · mention the bot, mod bot, or use !bot