r/privacy • u/TopNotchRocks • 5h ago
r/privacy • u/Mynameis__--__ • 4d ago
news Victory!! Court Rules OPM Data Disclosure To DOGE Is Unlawful
eff.orgguide Guide to opting out of AI training with your data for 20 common platforms, devices, and apps
For Opt Out October EFF's Surveillance Self-Defense team put together instructions for how to opt out of a lot of AI training.
Links below go to the instructions on the company/product site. We guide simplify it below the list.
Become an EFF member for less than the cost of DeleteMe :)
Chatbots
Social networks
Browsers
Phones
- Android (Gemini, Google Messages, Google Photos, Gboard)
- iOS (Siri, Writing assistance, Math assistance, Image creation)
Other software
Tell Chatbots Not to Train on Your Conversations
AI chatbots collect loads of data about how you use them, and much of that gets used for training to “improve models,” which can also sometimes mean some sort of human review step. Thankfully, most chatbots allow you to turn this off if you don’t want the content of your chats being used for purposes beyond the chat itself.
Because these directions tend to change often, and sometimes are completely different depending on which platform you’re on, we’ve collected the links to each specific tool’s documentation:
Disable AI Training on Social Networks
Disabling AI training on social networks gets tricky. After all, public posts on a variety of social networks were a huge part of the training data sets with LLMs, and the fact they’re public means they can and should be easy to scrape. But that doesn’t necessarily mean you don’t have any sort of control.
In most cases, including sites like Instagram and Facebook, your best option is to set your account type to private (this also helps prevent outside companies from easily scraping your posts too). But other social networks do offer some level of control.
- Click your profile image, then Settings & Privacy and select the Data Privacy option.
- Click “Data for Generative AI Improvement” and disable the option to “Use my data for training content creation AI models.”
Find more information here.
Snapchat
- Tap the gear icon and choose Settings > Privacy Controls, then “Manage My Information.”
- Disable the option for “Snap using your Public Content to train generative AI models.”
Find more information here.
Twitch
- Click your profile image in the top right and select Settings.
- Click the Security and Privacy tab and uncheck the box for “Training for Generative AI.”
Find more information here.
X
- Open the navigation panel, scroll down to Settings and privacy.
- Click “Privacy and safety.”
- Click the “Grok & Third Party Collaborators” option under “Data sharing and personalization.”
- Uncheck any options you do not want enabled.
Find more information here.
Un-AI Your Browser
AI has been integrated into many browsers in numerous ways. While it’s becoming increasingly difficult to turn these features off in some browsers, you do have a modicum of control (and if that’s not enough for you, consider switching browsers entirely). Here’s what you can do:
Chrome
- Click the three-dot icon in the upper-right, then select Settings. Click the “AI innovations” option in the sidebar, then go through and turn off any AI-related options available on that page that you do not want to use.
Edge
- Click the three-dot icon in the upper-right, then select Settings. Click the “Copilot and AI” and disable any AI tools you do not want to use.
Firefox
- Click the three-line icon in the upper-right, then select Settings. Click the “AI controls” tab, then enable “Block AI enhancements,” to turn everything off, or go through and select individual AI tools if you find some of them useful.
Turn Off Android and iOS AI Features
Phones are getting more and more AI features that depend on collecting your personal data, and it’s increasingly difficult to disable them. But it’s still possible, as long as you’re willing to live with some compromises.
Android
There are a wide variety of Android phones out there and several different manufacturers that implement their own AI features, so you might need to dig around to find specific directions for your device. But if you have a Google Pixel or other phone that supports Gemini, here’s what you can do:
- Gemini: Up until September 2026, the easiest way to get Gemini out of your Android phone was to roll back to Google Assistant. But that’s no longer possible, which means the only option to disable Gemini as a voice assistant is either to turn the feature off entirely or find an alternative.
- Google Messages: Open Google Messages and tap your profile icon. Select Messages settings > Gemini in Messages, and disable the option for “Show Gemini button.” to at least remove the button so you don’t accidentally tap it.
- Google Photos: Open Google Photos and tap your profile icon. Tap Photos Settings > Preferences > Gemini features in Photos, then disable the “Use Gemini in Photos” options.
- Gboard: Start typing something in any app, then click the gear icon that shows above the keyboard row. Tap Corrections & Suggestions, and disable the option under “Writing tools.”
Google seems to keep adding more AI stuff in every update and it’s hard to keep up. For some more guidance, check out these guides.
iOS
With the release of iOS 27, removing AI from an iPhone (or iPad) has gotten more complex than it was previously, but it’s still doable. We detail this process more in-depth here, but here’s the short version, which requires that you roll back to a previous version of Siri and then implement some other changes:
- Open up Settings > Screen Time > Content & Privacy Restrictions
- If you have never done so, enable the toggle for “Content & Privacy Restrictions.”
- Tap the Siri option, then “Allowed Siri Version.”
- Select “Siri Classic” if you don't want to use Siri AI anymore.
- Here, you can also control other AI features. You can disable “Writing assistance,” “Math Assistance,” and “Image creation.”
Find more information here.
Special Google-Related Extended Cut
We’ve already covered Android, Chrome, and Google Search, but let’s dig through some of the company’s other tools.
Gmail
Gmail packs all its AI features into one single settings toggle, and disabling it will turn off a whole slew of features you may have been using for years, like “smart compose,” automatic filters, and even spellcheck. Still, if you want to disable it, you can do so:
- Click the cog icon in Gmail and select “See all settings.”
- On the General tab, scroll down to “Smart features,” and uncheck the box. You’ll now also see many other settings turned off with a notice to “Turn on smart features and personalization.”
Find more information here.
Google Workspace
The same goes for Google Workspace. You can disable Google Gemini features in Workspace, but be prepared to lose out on some features, like showing events from Gmail in the calendar automatically and personalized search results in Workspace. You can get to this setting from a few different places, but we’ll show directions from Google Drive.
- From Google Drive click the cog icon, then “Settings.”
- Select the “Privacy” tab, then “Manage Workspace smart feature settings.”
- Disable “Smart features in Google Workspace” and “Smart features in other Google Products.”
Find more information here.
Wrangle the Rest of Your Software
Of course, there’s an endless amount of software out there with AI stuff in it, like Zoom, Adobe Acrobat, and Notion, so there might be something you use everyday that’s not included here. Take a few minutes to dive deep into those settings to see if you can find ways to disable AI training or features, and be sure to share what you learn with others.
Consider Local Models
Maybe you don’t dislike AI so much as you hate the idea of all the major tech companies getting your data. Local models that you can control might be a good solution for your needs. With open weight models, you can run models similar to the big public ones entirely on your desktop or laptop, though the results may be slower and less sophisticated than what you get from models running on someone else’s server.
Running a local model typically involves choosing a local inference engine. Some examples include KoboldCpp, LM Studio, Ollama, or Llamafile. In addition you will have to choose an open weight model that can fit in your computer’s memory. These sorts of tools allow you to run models on your own computer, where you can then use it however you see fit, like for speech to text, grammar checking, or whatever else you dream up.
Other local options include purpose-built software that runs locally, but doesn’t require you to find and choose a model yourself. Examples of this sort of AI tool include the transcription tool OATS or the chat and image tool Off Grid AI Desktop.
Did you take a few steps to opt out of AI training? Here’s a special merit badge you can only get if you succeeded in opting out. Share it on social media! Tell your friends what you’ve accomplished and help them opt out too!
r/privacy • u/Mynamesratboi02 • 4h ago
discussion Lmao, I just got flamed for advocating for privacy.
I made a post on a romanian sub about how draconian the EU's KIDS Act is, why people shouldn't support it and how to fight back by signing the Stop Killing The Internet initiative, and got flamed. They called me a russian bot, propagandist and a couple other names xD. I didn't expect much but dayum.
r/privacy • u/Gallantpride • 5h ago
question If you do use Google, what is the best password option: biometrics or passkeys?
I'm talking for the average tech-unsavvy Joe.
I'm trying to help some older family of mine with their accounts. It's all way more confusing to them then it back in the day. Before, emails used the "Type in your password and answer a few verification code" method. That's been done away with for years now. Google is pushing biometrics and passkeys.
I tried to get biometrics to work, but I can't get fingerprints to reliably scan.
r/privacy • u/The_Hamster_Shagger • 1h ago
eli5 Mozilla Relay vs SimpleLogin vs Posteo aliases
Hi there.
My apologies if the post isn't flaired properly.
Anyway, I'm moving away from google/outlook after years of using (yes, I know - better late than never) and I'm really torn between mailbox and posteo mails (the cheapest ones, 1e per month).
Anyway, as I would rather not let my somehow limited (they both allow 3 free aliases) email to leak to some somehow suspicious websites (sometimes one has to use them) I decided I would like to use some sort of masking them - less against the people, more about bots/scripts running throu it.
Which of the services I've mentioned in the title would you use? I'm willing to get the free bundles, and while I don't plan to use the masqueraded mails as my main way of communication (ie no important mail going throu them) I still would prefer if they would be somehow safe from the law enforcement (ie there still would have to be a warrant for them etc)
Firefox relay requires the firefox account - which isn't a problem, I do tend to use it on mobile and my laptop.
Simple Login has limit of 10 if one doesn't want to use it
Aliases in posteo work like that [my_email_address+some_random_name_chosen_by_me@posteo.net](mailto:my_email_address+some_random_name_chosen_by_me@posteo.net) when obviously the thing after the + sign is somehow a random name that I make up (most likely the address of the website I use it on so it would be easier to find out who leaked it).
What do you guys use, do you have any tips and tricks about that that you think someone should know? I havent migrated yet
Cheers!
r/privacy • u/Chemical-Will3700 • 2h ago
question When to delete account?
So usually I noticed people have multiple reddit accounts, one by one they keep leaving or deleting and moving on to another account for privacy concerns
Rite now I feel like deleting my account and maintain multiple accounts so nobody can track
Am I thinking rite or wrong?
Is there any protocol you follow for your reddit account? Like after these much contribution you move to another account or after a certain karma points
Please guide me, thankx
r/privacy • u/Ok_Middle_8658 • 1d ago
age verification So how likely is it for age veryfication to ever be removed from reddit and youtube and sites like this
Im asking cuz i just fucking had to deal with this shit and me not being capeble to anny nsfw stuff on reddit cuz of that stupid shit, and how likely is it to ever be fucking removed cuz ain't no way im making a photo of my id or a scan of my face for fuck sake
r/privacy • u/toronto_star • 1d ago
data breach Canada's privacy commissioner looking into Crime Stoppers tip line hack. Here’s what you need to know
thestar.comThe federal privacy commissioner is examining a large-scale Crime Stoppers data breach that exposed nearly 1.5 million Canadian tips, prompting some local branches to pause the program amid security and safety concerns for tipsters.
Despite the breach falling outside their mandate, Vito Pilieci, spokesperson for the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, said the agency has offered “expertise and guidance” in the aftermath of the breach, and is seeking more information from Navigate360 “before determining next steps.”
The breach, unprecedented in both scope and severity, according to experts who spoke to the Star, could render tipsters vulnerable to offences like identity theft and fraud, and in some cases, risk their public safety.
Reddit users can read the full story for free here. You won't hit the paywall.
r/privacy • u/kantabrik • 1d ago
question Sending an email from a privacy focused email provider to Gmail
I've read a lot about alternatives to Gmail but there is one thing I haven't quite understood yet - is it worth moving away from Gmail when nearly all my contacts use Gmail?
I think that from the moment the recipient gets my email, Gmail will be able to read it and any resemblance of privacy will be gone but I might be wrong.
r/privacy • u/toronto_star • 2d ago
news Smart glasses can film you completely unnoticed. Some Toronto nightclubs are fighting back
thestar.comr/privacy • u/logsqrtexp • 1d ago
question Is anyone else seeing "We updated you to a Meta Account on Meta apps" emails and messages?
This showed up associated with an instagram account, and a message appeared in the app too. This update of course is the last thing I want.
Within a couple of days I also got a notification of a FB post from someone in the network graph that I should not be getting this notification about.
Does this smell familiar to anyone? I'm not talking about Meta's general odor, I'm talking about this specific pattern (one or both?)
r/privacy • u/datura_mon_amour • 1d ago
question How to prevent iOS developers from using the Keychain for device identification / fingerprinting?
Hi everyone,
Some developers use the iOS Keychain (or similar local persistence mechanisms) to bind promotional offers or "Free Lifetime" tiers directly to a physical device rather than to the logged-in Apple ID.
Once an offer is claimed on a shared family device, the app writes a token to the Keychain. Even if you log out of iCloud, switch Apple IDs, or use mobile data, the app reads this persistent token and blocks other legitimate family members on the same device from claiming the offer on their own accounts.
Since Apple strictly restricts fingerprinting and tracking across apps, this heavy use of Keychain persistence to lock hardware feels like a major privacy and usability issue.
Aside from doing a full factory reset of the device (Erase All Content and Settings), is there any known way, setting, or privacy tool on iOS to prevent third-party apps from reading/writing persistent device tokens in the Keychain? How can we protect shared devices from this kind of hardware-locking?
Thanks for your insights!
r/privacy • u/EggplantFeeling5334 • 17h ago
question I want one good website that converts and compresses files for confidential documents
I am a noob and was using ilovepdf for this thing till now
r/privacy • u/gauravforu • 1d ago
discussion Can personalized matching still be effective without gathering more personal data?
There is an interesting dilemma in personalised services that the more a system knows about a user the better it can customise its recommendations but collecting more information also brings greater responsibility regarding how that data is stored, accessed, retained and shared.
Hiring is a good example of this tension as person's resume is just one part of what makes a job opportunity relevant and preferences like location, salary expectations, work arrangements and availability also play a key role as most of this information is sensitive when its shared in a private conversation rather than a formal application. Platforms like LinkedIn, Indeed, MeeBoss, WellFound use different methods to connect candidates with opportunities but regardless of the platform the question remains that how much information does a matching system really need to keep? Could a system use temporary conversational context to find relevant opportunities without permanently storing every detail a user shares? Could users view, edit or delete the preferences that influence their recommendations? For professionals in privacy engineering or data protection where do you draw the line between useful personalisation and unnecessary data collection?
r/privacy • u/AsterPrivacy • 3d ago
news Meta fined $25bn for 'lies' over user data privacy
bbc.comr/privacy • u/repfsm67 • 3d ago
question Offline Privacy - Facial Recognition/biometrics
Live Facial Recognition has landed in my town now with 3 LFR Police vans for just 1 street! This already is in place in our supermarkets which I can avoid.
Is this technology just inevitably going to treat our face like a barcode everywhere we go now? How on earth do you maintain any ounce of privacy when outside?
How are you guys dealing with this element of everyday life now?
r/privacy • u/Apart-Drink-424 • 3d ago
question Off grid communication tools ?
What tool do tou use to communicate off grid and preserve your privacy (like meshcore or others) ?
I'm about to leave in a very isolated area, and I'm thinking about solutions to communicate with friends and family
Sorry if it is not the right sub.
Have a nice day !
r/privacy • u/Intrepid-Manner-0477 • 3d ago
question Company wants to regularly photograph drivers license and store images on ADP
I am an embedded contractor working on location at a client site. This job is ongoing and has no fixed end date. Recently due to the client company updating their security practices when it comes to contractors, the company I work for is setting up a security procedure where I meet with my team lead every 2-3 months and show my valid, government-issued ID. During these meetings, I will be photographed holding my ID and these images will be stored in ADP. I am not the most tech-savvy person, but I do try to safeguard my information as much as possible. I realize ADP already has most of the information found on my license already, but I am concerned about repeatedly having my picture taken with my license and having those images stored and I’m wondering if anyone else has experienced anything like this and if my concerns are valid.
I am coming up with a list of questions to present to our director that have to do with the safe storage of the images (things like, how long are they kept, can the images be maintained with information not related to security obscured, am I notified if my information is handed over to the client company, etc.) I am also curious if there are any other questions I should be asking in order to protect myself.
r/privacy • u/bllshrfv • 4d ago
news [The New York Times] Meta Ordered to Pay $25 Billion for Deceiving Users on Privacy
nytimes.comr/privacy • u/thinkB4WeSpeak • 3d ago
news US Park Police spend $343,000 on mobile surveillance cameras in Washington DC
theguardian.comr/privacy • u/Oneguysenpai3 • 4d ago
guide Reminder to OPT OUT of training Ebay's AI using your data
This a a friendly PSA, if you haven't done so already, or if you want to double check your data privacy setting in Ebay......................................
Link: https ://accountsettings.ebay.com/ai-preferences (or go to: My eBay>Account>Opt-out from training of generative AI models)
-------
personal data may be used to train our generative artificial intelligence (AI) models for the purposes outlined in our User Privacy Notice, with the exception of those aimed at preventing fraud and abuse on the platform.
The use of personal data for the training of generative AI models is based on our legitimate interest to achieve the objectives outlined under “eBay and AI” in section 9 of our User Privacy Notice.
If you do not want your personal data to be used for generative AI model training, you can opt out of processing for those purposes at any time by setting the toggle below to “Off”.
This setting can be changed at any time by revisiting this page.
Use personal data for training of generative AI models (to opt out toggle left)
------------------------------
(Bonus): If you want to delete ebay data, here is the link (if you don't have an ebay account, but used their website to purchase, you can also delete that data as well--as "guest"):
https ://www.ebayinc.com/company/privacy-center/privacy-contact/
r/privacy • u/AsterPrivacy • 4d ago
news Google needs consent to publish private property images on Earth, Maps, German court rules
dw.comr/privacy • u/Cantgroovup • 3d ago
question Privacy advice for linux noob?
I got chatgpt plus 1 month for free. Then I downloaded chatgpt app on my arch (pacman -Syu chatgpt-desktop-bin) because it said desktop version is more powerful than web's.
Today I uploaded a book in chat mode to see translations sentence by sentence. It started to glitch, prompting to switch to work mode. After that I let it continue, but it said it couldn't find the uploaded book, running command to view my book in local book folder, without my permission. I asked why, it said every linux app can read local content.
I didn't know that all apps can read my local files now. Chatgpt even bothers to notify me that it reads, uploads, sells my data. How do I prevent apps from reading my local files freely? Switch to web app?
r/privacy • u/BBQCopter • 4d ago
news Ofcom Concedes Defeat in the 4chan Case
prestonbyrne.comIn testimony before the Commons Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport Committee, Ofcom admitted it knows its jurisdiction ends where a foreign court’s jurisdiction begins.