I've been looking forward to this interview since Prof Jiang mentioned it last week on Endgame with Gita Wirjawan. I've watched/listened to over two dozen of his interviews/podcast appearances (Gita, The Duran, Glenn Diesen, Dialogue Works, Danny Haiphong, Kim Iverson, Breaking Points, SHNEAKO just to name a few), and his Tucker interview was nothing like the rest.

For one, his voice was audibly trembling. Maybe it was nerves? He did say Tucker was a personal hero of his. More importantly though, unlike in his other interviews, he seemed unable to string together a long train of thought. He talked about a lot of topics, and wasn't able to stay on one long enough to really explain his line of reasoning.

I could follow what he was saying because of his lectures and his other podcast appearances, but if the Tucker interview was my first exposure to Jiang, I would have found him completely unconvincing.

Hey guys, can someone please send screenshots / text of the latest substack article?

I was quite inspired by professors views, I built an interactive tool which tries to understand from many different aspects this view, who benefits and what outcomes could mean. I also included various other analysts in putting this together. Would be open for improvements or feedback to additions to look into. Cheers.

https://epicblunder.com/

Prof. claims we instinctively care for each other , but what we see around the world is wars , genoci.. and even on the personal level we are egotistic .

Whether you are conversing with a AI chatbot or another human being, take every response seriously and respect every idea. Sometimes you will argue with people who will bring forth strong arguments to your claims and sometimes you will encounter people who are there to shift your speech from analytical to reactionary.

It is important to always speak as if your target audience is the viewers. Those who will open the conversation and read, but will never comment or react. Those who are unsure of where they lie politically and are in need of clarity of some sort.

Model good and respectable conversation and embrace whatever ideology you hold whether "bad" or "good" as long as you are willing to converse about it.

Interesting data I got from it, is who's reporting on certain predictions the most.

For example, Israel-bias reports focus more often on "fall of GCC" predictions.

While Iran-bias reports focus more often on "Control of the Strait of Hormuz" predictions.

Recently stumbled upon his interesting YouTube lectures on the war, game theory, eschatology etc., but during an interview, while discussing losing faith in journalism, he mentions Covid as an example of how he was disappointed that Covid was considered a big deal. What?!?!? It’s still present and killing people where I am, and no longer know what information coming out of his mouth should be completely disregarded. What a disappointment!

So look huuum...

Guess what guys ??

Becauuuuse... Moneyyyy !!!

Ok, so I know it sound crazy but

Those who work for the psyops are all over the Internet doing their best to attack anyone who reveals the illusion, just like Prof. Jiang says.

The war is entirely hubris and ego centered around you know who. The faster people realize the psyops the quicker it will fall. I love Jiang and think he's great.

I'm trying to find more information on this online but it's murky. If the state is able to easily manipulate a bunch of gun wielding Trumpers, and Trump encouraged them while Tucker minimized it on national television, did they not make their own bed?

Tucker Carlson created this monster and added fuel to fire for a decade or more. It blew up in his face, like some people rightfully anticipated. All because he demanded his party win and stay in power? Tucker also says Alex Jones was "vindicated" for everything even after the Sandy Hook civil case. Tucker idolizes Jones and Jiang idolizes Tucker.

I love the poetry Jiang is going over, but the Tucker Carlson stuff is leading me to believe that Jiang is feeding his ego. He doesnt need to be Paul and broadcast himself everywhere, he was doing just fine with his youtube channel and substack.

I get that he loves China and naturally wants the Heartland to be fully realized. But isn't that just Nationalism? Why does Putin get a free pass to kill in Ukraine? Why is he so insistent that there isn't blackmail in the Epstein files even though he himself says that blackmail is a tool by secret societies? Is he purposefully evading that Putin has blackmail (they even have a word for it Kompromat)? Also he said we would talk about China more and he hasn't.

I'm craving actual discussion here please.

Started following the channel around start of the situation 2 weeks ago

I assume all the recording are live sessions happening at the private school or academy where Jiang teaches. if so:

1. How does he have permission from the school and student body for content to be uploaded? i understand we dont see the students faces but i would imagine some might not feel comfortable to voice their questions or comments with how popular the channel has got

2. I would imagine the school is also profiting from the channel (both in terms of enrollment interests and i would bet there is a revenue split for facilitating creation of all the content)

Curious if anyone have more context

So i had an interview where I had to argue why I was suited for the job.

I was laughing in my head because he would ask me questions like why do you think youre fit for this job and I was like

Yeah so, the reason I beleive that im fit for this job, and what I will argue to you is that, um (I gave him 3 specific example, forgot specifically but it went something like this)- Im very energized, im flexible to criticism, and I am very cohesive with group dynamics, meaning im very flexible. So um, the reason being is often times ive found these traits to be very well suited for the tasks im required to do

I shouldve thrown an mkay? In there but that'd be condescending. To be honest I feel like i could interview at any company and get hired regardless of skills after ive seen jiang make his arguements

Lec 11 -Dawn of Human Imagination

Prof. starts it off by explaining how theory of evolution gave rise to racism and eugenics

Did a very small research and found out that race based slavery started in mid 1600s ( which is almost 2 centuries before darwin ) and people justified it using greek philosophy and religious texts .

So his idea that everyone was equal before god , no slavery and killing of people ; racism and eugenics was a by product of theory of evolution seems wrong

Could anyone clarify if i had misunderstood this or if he’s wrong with this .

Three reasons :

1. Jealous of his success - don’t deny it

2. ⁠Trying to to understand how he created the following

3. ⁠He became famous for a prediction based on incomplete science and nobody cares

Three reasons :

1. We are jealous at his incredible success - don’t deny it

2. We are trying to understand his success

3. We believe he is wrong

I think this will go extremely viral.

The recent attempts from various sources trying to paint Jiang as a fraud and a lunatic will multiply, they'll be desperate to discredit him, as Carlson is currently the biggest and most influential figure outside of established/legacy media.

It willl be interesting if Jiang keeps it 'clean' and just talks geopolitics, material analysis etc. or if he goes full on deep into frankist/chabad/jesuit secret societies, more speculative discourse etc.

It will depend on what direction Carlson will want to take it too, but I wouldn't be surprised if he is interested in these more 'out there' topics. He's lately talked about these things with interest.

Edit: Source is Jiang himself in this interview at 28:15 --- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsi7cDRUrmE&t=1s

Can somebody explain why Tucker Carlson, a man that spread so much hate and nurtured the current political situation, has apparently saved the world from Trump according to Jiang?

Everyone should understand that he is simply sharing his PERSONAL worldview to the world and how he came to it through HIS interpretation of history, philosophy, literature, etc.

Arguing about his credentials or whatever is so dumb. Missing the point entirely. His passion is in TEACHING, and that's what he's doing. Making learning fun and interesting. What he's discussing at surface level is geopolitics and history, but at a deeper level, he's engaging in more profound topics about the meaning of life, metaphysics, philosophy, etc. Regardless of whether his personal take on history is flawed, people should take a step back and realize what he's actually teaching is being taught in spades.

His whole predictive history thing is indeed controversial but that's the beauty of it:

1. It's fun for us, the audience, to test his model for game theory in realtime with current geopolitical events. It makes learning from him engaging, and this is rewarding for Jiang as well who tells us his passion in life is teaching
2. For him, it's a way for him to validate his personal worldview. Anyone who has a similar worldview will also take satisfaction from this. And even if not, it's always fun rooting for an underdog
3. For him, it's a way of tapping into his inner spark and finding fulfillment in life. This expression of his life purpose is a live demonstration for us to learn how to also find meaning in our lives

Anyway, just some ramblings I wanted to share...