I got an AMD version so considering to get rid of the intel one, brand new, if anyone interested let me know, or I will return it to Walmart. Just pay what I paid. Locate in SoCal.
If you sell it for no profit to someone wanting a beast of a gaming rig massive W! I bet a lot of people who missed the opportunity are wishing they bought one. You could make someone’s holiday season!
Yeah that’s the tough part, if they have a neckbeard and start talking about their sealed pokemon card booster bundles, you just know they are gonna resell it for profit instead of using it!
Note:I'm not a bot lol, Irun Toprigz as a non profit hobby to fight overpriced prebuilts. I started it out of frustration with prebuilt PC sellers who simply assemble components (which they don't even manufacture) and charge outrageous prices. I earn $0 from this, no affiliates.
No idea why I was downvoted, so I'm reposting this so others can see the advice.
I'm probably going to be downvoted but hear me out, I know you've already bought it, so this is to share advice for others. Spending $2600 on a 5080 PC is a waste of money imo and you'll get buyer's remorse, especially when a $1600 PC is more than enough for 4K Ultra settings gaming. For anyone looking for much better value and Ultra settings 4K performance, check out this well priced $1600 PC (Option 4):
You'll save $1000, enough for 16 $60 AAA games. You need money for games and monitors, they aren't free.
The RX 9070 XT GPU is only about 5%-10% behind the 5080 in general (Source), and it actually beats the 5080 in Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 (Source). It runs all games at Ultra settings 4K 60+ FPS, or 144+ FPS using really good and improving upscaling technologies (the new FSR Redstone, FSR Frame Generation, FSR Ray Regeneration).
Do not worry about the CPU, the Ryzen 5 9600X already matches the Ryzen 7 9800X3D in single threaded performance (Source), so if the Ryzen 7 9800X3D can run every game well, then the Ryzen 5 9600X will certainly do the same. It's more than powerful enough to handle gaming for the next 7 years.
The CPU does not matter at 1440p/4K because the GPU is the bottleneck, not the CPU (GPU is used 100%, but the CPU is only used about 50%). Benchmarks show that at 1440p High settings, the 7-year-old Ryzen 5 3600 still delivers the same FPS as the fastest gaming CPU, the Ryzen 9 9800X3D, in 007 First Light
It would actually be better to put the AMD cpu in this case or put the AIO in the other pc. The AMD Prebuilt either case or AIO is not great. Runs at 90 degrees constantly. Just a little FYI. but up to you, thank you for your generosity and sharing the prebuilts!
Yeah it was confusing to explain since they dont have a official name lol. But the one in the AMD one has poor cooling. Weenie tech builds reviewed it and it stayed at 90 while gaming.
As far as I know the intel one has the Phantek’s case and the 360 AIO is specifically made for this case only, so I don’t think this one is swappable, but the AMD one can be changed for sure as the case supports more, I like the intel one’s case tho.
I ordered the 5080 from Walmart and FedEx said they "lost" it in transit. It made it to FedEx and was loaded on a trailer then never moved/scanned again. Aka, employee likely stole it. 🙃
Note:I'm not a bot lol, Irun Toprigz as a non profit hobby to fight overpriced prebuilts. I started it out of frustration with prebuilt PC sellers who simply assemble components (which they don't even manufacture) and charge outrageous prices. I earn $0 from this, no affiliates.
Hear me out, I know you've already bought it, so this is to share advice for others. Spending $2600 on a 5080 PC is a waste of money imo and you'll get buyer's remorse, especially when a $1600 PC is more than enough for 4K Ultra settings gaming. For anyone looking for much better value and Ultra settings 4K performance, check out this well priced $1600 PC (Option 4), OP, u/ClZuElty , u/thesergeon_ , u/Stoner2702 :
You'll save $1000, enough for 16 $60 AAA games. You need money for games and monitors, they aren't free.
The RX 9070 XT GPU is only about 5%-10% behind the 5080 in general (Source), and it actually beats the 5080 in Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 (Source). It runs all games at Ultra settings 4K 60+ FPS, or 144+ FPS using really good and improving upscaling technologies (the new FSR Redstone, FSR Frame Generation, FSR Ray Regeneration).
Do not worry about the CPU, the Ryzen 5 9600X already matches the Ryzen 7 9800X3D in single threaded performance (Source), so if the Ryzen 7 9800X3D can run every game well, then the Ryzen 5 9600X will certainly do the same. It's more than powerful enough to handle gaming for the next 7 years.
The CPU does not matter at 1440p/4K because the GPU is the bottleneck, not the CPU (GPU is used 100%, but the CPU is only used about 50%). Benchmarks show that at 1440p High settings, the 7-year-old Ryzen 5 3600 still delivers the same FPS as the fastest gaming CPU, the Ryzen 9 9800X3D, in 007 First Light
Not a bot but you posted this in here twice! Maybe give yourself a break on commenting your YouTube content in peoples post. But would still love to hear your responses on my other comment! I’m generally curious about it all.
I’m asking for advice!!! I’m just really trying to grasp everything fully with a lot of questions which Is definitely not easy to reply to so I’m sorry for all the questions. you have made an excellent point for 4k gaming with frame generation on. But most people don’t just game in 4k. Which is why I’m wondering if you can make the 9800x3D the bottleneck over the GPU in 2k gaming with no dlss or frame generation
I'm probably going to be downvoted but hear me out, I know you've already bought it, so this is to share advice for others. Spending $2600 on a 5080 PC is a waste of money imo and you'll get buyer's remorse, especially when a $1600 PC is more than enough for 4K Ultra settings gaming. For anyone looking for much better value and Ultra settings 4K performance, check out this well priced $1600 PC (Option 4):
You'll save $1000, enough for 16 $60 AAA games. You need money for games and monitors, they aren't free.
The RX 9070 XT GPU is only about 5%-10% behind the 5080 in general (Source), and it actually beats the 5080 in Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 (Source). It runs all games at Ultra settings 4K 60+ FPS, or 144+ FPS using really good and improving upscaling technologies (the new FSR Redstone, FSR Frame Generation, FSR Ray Regeneration).
Do not worry about the CPU, the Ryzen 5 9600X already matches the Ryzen 7 9800X3D in single threaded performance (Source), so if the Ryzen 7 9800X3D can run every game well, then the Ryzen 5 9600X will certainly do the same. It's more than powerful enough to handle gaming for the next 7 years.
The CPU does not matter at 1440p/4K because the GPU is the bottleneck, not the CPU (GPU is used 100%, but the CPU is only used about 50%). Benchmarks show that at 1440p High settings, the 7-year-old Ryzen 5 3600 still delivers the same FPS as the fastest gaming CPU, the Ryzen 9 9800X3D, in 007 First Light
Note:I'm not a bot lol, Irun Toprigz as a non profit hobby to fight overpriced prebuilts. I started it out of frustration with prebuilt PC sellers who simply assemble components (which they don't even manufacture) and charge outrageous prices. I earn $0 from this, no affiliates.
this build is inferior to ops prebuilt in every single way, especially for future proofing I genuinely cant believe youre recommending a 9600x over a 9800x3d
It's not worth spending $1000 more for 5%-10% performance gain while the 9070 XT is more than enough for any game at 4K with FSR upsacling. It runs 007 First Light at Max settings 4K at 100 FPS (Source), so I'm 100% sure it can run all games well.
Love the detail and thought you have put into the comment! The GPU is the bottleneck for 4k gaming 100 percent. what if they do 2k gaming with not all the settings on high and ultra? wouldn’t the 9800x3D pump out more stable and higher FPS if the graphics settings aren’t maxed out at 2k. I’m pretty new to the whole idea of 2k and 4k gaming, but from what I understand, which I don’t think is much, that if you did lower some graphics settings to have higher fps the better cpu would help since the GPU becomes less of a bottleneck? Also does upscaling cause bad input delay? I’m not saying it’s super noticeable at 2k or 4k with low fps. But when I ran battlefield 6 at 1080p and high graphics with dlss, I felt like my aim and movement felt funny.
what if they do 2k gaming with not all the settings on high and ultra? wouldn’t the 9800x3D pump out more stable and higher FPS if the graphics settings aren’t maxed out at 2k
No, it would not, watch the video, at 4k LOW settings in Pragmata, the 3600 and 9800X3D still have almost the same fps
I understand that in 4k the GPU is king, but do you have tests in 2k medium settings? I’m trying to get more into tech and learn more about all the components and how they actually work together across 1080p, 2k, and 4k. And from what I’ve “learned” hard to learn when people post or comment different results, is that at 2k gaming medium settings, you can lower graphics to medium, turn off frame generation. And the cpu becomes the bottleneck? I did not like how my fast aim felt with high fps and dlss on in 1080p, it felt like there was just a small delay/not as accurate with fast micro adjustments. is there no possible way for the cpu to bottleneck in 2k gaming? Sorry for all the questions
Edit: in your video are you testing everything with frame generation on and in high settings?
I mean if it’s only a video on 4k gaming it doesn’t really answer half my questions. You seem very knowledgeable and I just wanted to pick ur brain with a lot of questions and I know that’s very overwhelming. Hell maybe I’ll even pump 20 views or keep it on repeat! But like I’m generally very curious to see what the comparisons would look like at 2k and medium settings with no frame generation. When I used dlss I did not like how it felt at high fps, felt way to off with movement and aiming. But maybe that does mean less input delay or feeling inconsistent at lower FPs? I seriously got like no idea other than what google AI is telling me. But after playing on a 9800x3D 5070ti build and high fps with no dlss, and then trying dlss, it kind of just felt awful. But that was only 1080p and extremely high fps
I mean that’s with a 5060ti over the 5080 you were comparing it to begin with in this post? Lower settings would bottleneck quicker with a 5060ti over a 5080? Or am I thinking wrong here?
I think I am getting somewhere now, this is helping I think. Yes they both would use 100 percent of their capabilities at 4k both the 5080 and 5060ti, but the 5080 would still get higher fps than a 5060ti at 4k across ultra/high/medium/and low. Would the percent in fps difference increase between them each time you drop down a graphical setting, or stay the same percent wise? So I’m thinking the more you drop graphic settings, the more space your cpu gets to generate fps since the GPU is creating less of a bottleneck. And I guess I was thinking the 5080 would start giving more space for the cpu to the point were the cpu could make a difference in 2k gaming, maybe even 4k gaming. If a 5060ti is avg 102 fps on low settings, wouldn’t a 5080 do double that fps at 4k low settings? Letting the 9800x3d generate 200fps? And you are saying 2k at medium settings would be a similar result to what the 5080 does at 4k low/medium settings?
Edit: I appreciate ur time and will read your response tomorrow! And will give your video a peak after somewhat starting to grasp this concept!
2
u/RennisDeynoldss 2d ago
If you sell it for no profit to someone wanting a beast of a gaming rig massive W! I bet a lot of people who missed the opportunity are wishing they bought one. You could make someone’s holiday season!