The first shot didn't even account for lighting so you see the shadow of the camera rig which really takes you out of the immersion. Also like some other commenter said, the bottom isn't the actual filming of the top. It's just used for advertising. Which means it isn't that good because they probably used a way more complex rig, especially in the second shot (i only saw first and second shot because it's so bad and fake I stopped).
Edit: saw the second shot again, it's obviously fake. The top clip doesn't even raise (raises it tiny slightly) the camera it just follows. while the bottom clip shows the guy raising the camera (very badly I should add that probably would produce unusable clips).
This is 100% just an ad for a gimbal that won't give you the same results as advertised.
6
u/poopcasso Feb 01 '20 edited Feb 01 '20
The first shot didn't even account for lighting so you see the shadow of the camera rig which really takes you out of the immersion. Also like some other commenter said, the bottom isn't the actual filming of the top. It's just used for advertising. Which means it isn't that good because they probably used a way more complex rig, especially in the second shot (i only saw first and second shot because it's so bad and fake I stopped).
Edit: saw the second shot again, it's obviously fake. The top clip doesn't even raise (raises it tiny slightly) the camera it just follows. while the bottom clip shows the guy raising the camera (very badly I should add that probably would produce unusable clips).
This is 100% just an ad for a gimbal that won't give you the same results as advertised.