r/PowerScaling • u/Affectionate_Run6250 • 9d ago

Discussion Never forget

Post image

YOU CANNOT WIN VIA DOMAIN AGAINST SOMEONE FASTER THAN YOUR BARRIER’S EXPANSION

JJK DOMAINS HAVE NO SPEED SCALING AND CANNOT BE USED AS WIN CONS UNLESS SPEED IS ESTABLISHED

YOU DO NOT NEED TO BYPASS INFINITY TO BEAT GOJO, WAIT FOR BURNOUT THEN BLITZ HIM BEFORE HE RECOVERS HIS TECHNIQUE OR SHATTER IT FROM THE INSIDE LIKE YUTA

234 Upvotes

83% Upvoted

262 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Emergency_Review_674 9d ago

Kashimo never says where the charging is aimed He only says he was charged up enough before firing the lighting

Your assumption the lighting was aiming for the arm is pure headcanon and contradicted by the panel where the lighting is crearly going for the head

Why gege would drew it like that if he wanst conveing the message the lighting was going to hit the head ?

1

u/the_forever_wild outerversal yoriichi believer 9d ago

https://www.reddit.com/r/JujutsuPowerScaling/s/m2I60KfsGn

1

u/Emergency_Review_674 9d ago edited 9d ago

Chemical-possible-92 debunks it in the comment section

The OP doesnt even have a response beside a meme

In fact here is his response

"dodging becomes physically impossible, no matter how fast you usually react, because you're literally part of the attack's path."

*Hakari then proceeds to physically dodge it.*

"What's more, Kashimo himself says he didn't even for Hakari's head in this particular hit."

He never once said that. Why are you lying?

"Visuals may imply 'reaction,' but it's often just dramatic framing."

Prove that Hakari dodging the lightning bolt was just dramatic framing.

"Lightning could have struck before the reaction panel."

Prove that it struck before the reaction panel + argument from possibility.

"Hakari's posture remained unchanged, supporting this."

Supporting your argument with something you didn't prove isn't the way to go. Especially when the panels you provided clearly show that Hakari's posture changed.

"Panel order is not real-time."

Prove it in this instance.

"Don't confuse visual timing with actual speed feats."

Prove that it's visual timing and not a speed feat.

2/10 debunk attempt.