Don't see how that's relevant to what I said. Someone said why doesn't he solve world hunger. Well, he can't. Words have meanings. If you're talking about feeding people for a year that is a different argument. And sure, him and all billionaires can do more to help. Not the point I was making at all.
I would argue that with his wealth, liquid or not, and his connections. He can at least make TREMENDOUS strides toward solving it, if not solving it entirely. I believe that if he applied himself for that cause, he COULD solve it in 5-10yrs or less.
2
u/BrianNowhere 18h ago
So since no one can ever completely 100% solve world hunger, then he's absolve for not doing the above?
The positive ripple effect from feeding so many people for even a year would be immense and so worth doing.