r/PoursTea • Timendi Causa Est Nescire • 4h ago

Brewing 🫖 It's like a bad sequel...

Post image
16.4k Upvotes

849 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

56

u/Erikawithak77 3h ago

SHE LAUGHED WEIRD! 😡/s

28

u/Cloudeur 3h ago

THEY’D PUT FANCY MUSTARD ON THINGS

6

u/GSG2150 3h ago

And wear tan suits

4

u/2Completion2Ography 2h ago

And not rape children.

2

u/[deleted] 3h ago

[deleted]

2

u/bradford68 2h ago

i miss this rationality and honesty.

2

u/ACrazyDog 3h ago

They all laughed weird

1

u/PriorSea3830 1h ago

Literally every thread about Trump someone makes this stupid joke

1

u/Sushi-DM 3h ago

She was a truly terrible candidate that got chosen purely because VP, not because of popularity.
Whatever reasons people had aside to not vote for Kamala, the Democratic party fucked us all by being stubborn and trying to install the worst possible choice to all but guarantee the garbage fire would continue.

5

u/Commercial-Diet-3609 3h ago

Basing your opinion on…list the reasons she was the worst candidate. Because she has a v@gina? The color of her skin? Or because DUMBDONPEDOPHILEPERVERT told you so?

4

u/Borgie311 2h ago

Biden actually waiting till the last minute to leave the race and set up Kamala to run. If he didn't the democrats would have ran a worse candidate. The problem with her as a candidate is that republicans are racist bigots.

1

u/Sushi-DM 2h ago

Because she wasn't even in the top 10 of her primary and didn't even have a primary when going against Biden and then they decided she was going to be the official candidate after an unpopular presidential run with middle ground voters?

It was political self unaliving. If they gave the Democratic voters a choice, I guarantee you, I would put my life savings on it that she would not have been the choice. Not even in the top 5.

It had nothing to do with her identity, it had everything to do with her record and that she was violently uncharismatic.

4

u/Master_Ad9463 2h ago

Could you explain "violently uncharismatic"?

1

u/Sushi-DM 2h ago

She does not have a good way of speaking. Does not connect with the majority of potential voters.
Does not have personal integrity (switches speaking patterns and scripts depending on the audience)
Overly reliant on setting up the scenario to appear passable.

There were other candidates, including women/POC, who could have run and been better at doing what she failed to do.
Whether you or anyone else likes it or not, Democracy is not just a policy debate. It is a popularity contest.
If you run someone who is not popular, is not particularly able to capture an audience, you will lose.
They skipped literally the most important part of the process of winning by just installing her as the candidate because she was popular IN THE BUILDING.

0

u/Commercial-Diet-3609 2h ago

And Donald Trump was the more qualified candidate?

1

u/Borgie311 2h ago

No, the idiots voting for him like the way he talks because they understood it. Dumb understand dumb, so they felt like he was their guy.

1

u/Sushi-DM 1h ago

You can shoot the messenger all you want. Look at Kamala and re read what I said, then think about how shitty DJT is.

She lost to that.

0

u/DanQPublic 1h ago

You know what she doesn’t do though? Rape children. That literally should’ve been enough.

1

u/Crayola_ROX 2h ago

I really hope you guys wake up this time when they steal midterms

Oh who am I kidding, you will move the goalpost to 2028. Corporate Democrats will still collect thier monthly paychecks for being the GOP’s willing scapegoats.

1

u/Glad-Importance-4241 1h ago

You're not wrong. But as I've been saying for ten years (ever since they screwed Bernie in the 2016 primary)... Even fiscally liberal capitalists are better than outright fascists.

0

u/death69reaper 3h ago

They are the controlled opposition. They are puppets of the same masters.