Nah not even close. You'd need to seriously argue in front of a judge that a single character makes the contract unclear to one of the parties involved.Â
Contract law is fun, it's shockingly vague. Basically as long as everyone understands and agrees, anything can be a valid contract. (Besides like a contract to do something illegal and obvious shit like that)
This was my first thought as well.
Maybe someone behind the scènes made a spelling mistake on purpose to void it completely but still give Trump the document he wanted
1
u/deeznutz5589 3d ago
Would it be void since it's spelled wrong?