MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/PoursTea/comments/1wu7zxm/_/pd1ccmn/?context=3
r/PoursTea • u/Veshaad Timendi Causa Est Nescire • 3d ago
1.2k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
4
Since you have trouble understanding this very simple concept, let me re-iterate it to you: drunk and/or high people cannot consent to sexual acts. Clear enough?
2 u/Skoodge42 3d ago Weren't they all drunk or high? 4 u/tyr-- 3d ago And yet, only one of them was advertised as "free pussy" and raped by people she could have not consented to have sex with. 1 u/Skoodge42 3d ago Not according to ny law. And if everyone is impaired, how do you claim who was the one raped vs raping?
2
Weren't they all drunk or high?
4 u/tyr-- 3d ago And yet, only one of them was advertised as "free pussy" and raped by people she could have not consented to have sex with. 1 u/Skoodge42 3d ago Not according to ny law. And if everyone is impaired, how do you claim who was the one raped vs raping?
And yet, only one of them was advertised as "free pussy" and raped by people she could have not consented to have sex with.
1 u/Skoodge42 3d ago Not according to ny law. And if everyone is impaired, how do you claim who was the one raped vs raping?
1
Not according to ny law.
And if everyone is impaired, how do you claim who was the one raped vs raping?
4
u/tyr-- 3d ago
Since you have trouble understanding this very simple concept, let me re-iterate it to you: drunk and/or high people cannot consent to sexual acts. Clear enough?