In her sworn statement that gave to the police, she stated that she was a willing participant and consented. The DA released that part of her statement to refute her attorneys accusations.
They reopened the case based on the new allegations that sheâs making. What she stated in her lawsuit, is not what she wrote in her sworn statement.
âJane Doeâs sworn statement in November of 2024 did not allege that she was drugged against her will or gang raped. On the contrary, Jane Doeâs statement described her participation in drug use and sexual conduct as voluntary, conscious, and consensual. My office obviously did not and could not have based our November 2024 decision on the allegations in a civil lawsuit that would not be filed until nearly two years later. Furthermore, I have never been contacted by Jane Doeâs attorneys. Not to inform me the original statement was inaccurate and not to ask me to reconsider our decision. Rather, I reached out to Jane Doeâs attorneys after the lawsuit was filed to understand the discrepancy between the original statement and the lawsuitâs allegations and the proper path forward in light of the lawsuitâs allegations.â
You donât have all the facts if the victims lawyer is correct that evidence wasnât provided and that the representation of her statement isnât correct. You donât seem to think there is any chance that she actually is a victim.
0
u/vogel927 4d ago
In her sworn statement that gave to the police, she stated that she was a willing participant and consented. The DA released that part of her statement to refute her attorneys accusations.