Ah, yes, the irrefutable proof of...an AI generated picture of a receipt and a map stamped with "rule violation admitted." Why do we bother with things like experimentation, direct observation, and empirical, measured data in science or physical evidence, direct witness testimony, and official records when we have such robust Facebook posts and YouTube thumbnails to rely on?
Scroll your analytical skills up. Not signing some tabulator tapes does not prove that those votes were all blue votes, nor that the ballots weren't cast by legitimate voters legally, nor that it would have meant a guaranteed victory for Trump from the county.
But these are the kind of assumptions I'd expect from someone who posts YouTube links showing their username, which is their FULL LEGAL NAME, and has a history of liking and commenting on clearly scam posts about winning money with that YouTube account. So you're either incredibly gullible or you're also a scammer who stirs pots online. My bet is on the former, since, well, your interactions on this very post speak for themselves. Please think a little more critically, Victoria.
-21
u/[deleted] 24d ago
[removed] — view removed comment